TSTP Solution File: ALG350-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : ALG350-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 18:06:09 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Y_0,axiom,
( c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,v_Y____,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(v_P,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Y_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(v_xa,v_Y____,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_real__less__def_0,axiom,
( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_real__less__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(v_P,v_xa)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,v_Y____,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(v_P,X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Y_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(v_xa,v_Y____,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_real__less__def_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,v_Y____,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(v_P,X1)) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(v_P,v_xa)),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(v_xa,v_Y____,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( c_lessequals(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_xa,v_Y____,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : ALG350-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat May 18 23:30:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.51 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # new_bool_3 with pid 4684 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.51 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4687 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.51 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.51 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.51 # Parsed axioms : 380
% 0.21/0.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 351
% 0.21/0.51 # Initial clauses : 29
% 0.21/0.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 29
% 0.21/0.51 # Processed clauses : 38
% 0.21/0.51 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # ...subsumed : 10
% 0.21/0.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 28
% 0.21/0.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Generated clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Paramodulations : 2
% 0.21/0.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.21/0.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11
% 0.21/0.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 33
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 19
% 0.21/0.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 28
% 0.21/0.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24
% 0.21/0.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 10
% 0.21/0.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.21/0.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3742
% 0.21/0.51 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1115
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.51 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 2040 pages
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.21/0.51 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1932 pages
% 0.21/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.51 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------