TSTP Solution File: ALG339-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : ALG339-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 18:13:06 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.76s 0.71s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.76s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 47 ( 0 equ; 33 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,v_d2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,v_d1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_real__lbound__gt__zero_0,axiom,
( c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealDef_Osko__RealDef__Xreal__lbound__gt__zero__1__1(X1,X2),tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_real__lbound__gt__zero_0) ).
cnf(cls_real__lbound__gt__zero_2,axiom,
( c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_RealDef_Osko__RealDef__Xreal__lbound__gt__zero__1__1(X1,X2),X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_real__lbound__gt__zero_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_d2,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_real__lbound__gt__zero_1,axiom,
( c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_RealDef_Osko__RealDef__Xreal__lbound__gt__zero__1__1(X1,X2),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_real__lbound__gt__zero_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_d1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,v_d2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,v_d1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealDef_Osko__RealDef__Xreal__lbound__gt__zero__1__1(X1,X2),tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_real__lbound__gt__zero_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,v_d2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X1,v_d1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealDef_Osko__RealDef__Xreal__lbound__gt__zero__1__1(X1,X2),tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_RealDef_Osko__RealDef__Xreal__lbound__gt__zero__1__1(X1,X2),X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_real__lbound__gt__zero_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_RealDef_Osko__RealDef__Xreal__lbound__gt__zero__1__1(X1,X2),v_d1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_RealDef_Osko__RealDef__Xreal__lbound__gt__zero__1__1(X1,X2),v_d2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_RealDef_Osko__RealDef__Xreal__lbound__gt__zero__1__1(X1,X2),X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_d2,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_RealDef_Osko__RealDef__Xreal__lbound__gt__zero__1__1(X1,X2),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_real__lbound__gt__zero_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_RealDef_Osko__RealDef__Xreal__lbound__gt__zero__1__1(X1,v_d2),v_d1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_RealDef_Osko__RealDef__Xreal__lbound__gt__zero__1__1(X1,X2),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_d1,tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : ALG339-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat May 18 23:41:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.76/0.71 # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.76/0.71 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.76/0.71 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.76/0.71 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.76/0.71 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.76/0.71 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.76/0.71 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.76/0.71 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 16778 completed with status 0
% 1.76/0.71 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 1.76/0.71 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.76/0.71 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.76/0.71 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.76/0.71 # No SInE strategy applied
% 1.76/0.71 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.76/0.71 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.76/0.71 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 123s (1) cores
% 1.76/0.71 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 1.76/0.71 # Starting U----_100_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_ND_S04AN with 123s (1) cores
% 1.76/0.71 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 123s (1) cores
% 1.76/0.71 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0i with 123s (1) cores
% 1.76/0.71 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with pid 16788 completed with status 0
% 1.76/0.71 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N
% 1.76/0.71 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.76/0.71 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.76/0.71 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.76/0.71 # No SInE strategy applied
% 1.76/0.71 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 1.76/0.71 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.76/0.71 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 123s (1) cores
% 1.76/0.71 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 1.76/0.71 # Starting U----_100_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_ND_S04AN with 123s (1) cores
% 1.76/0.71 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 123s (1) cores
% 1.76/0.71 # Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 1.76/0.71 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.76/0.71
% 1.76/0.71 # Proof found!
% 1.76/0.71 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.76/0.71 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.76/0.71 # Parsed axioms : 546
% 1.76/0.71 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.76/0.71 # Initial clauses : 546
% 1.76/0.71 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.76/0.71 # Initial clauses in saturation : 546
% 1.76/0.71 # Processed clauses : 1807
% 1.76/0.71 # ...of these trivial : 51
% 1.76/0.71 # ...subsumed : 553
% 1.76/0.71 # ...remaining for further processing : 1203
% 1.76/0.71 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 34
% 1.76/0.71 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.76/0.71 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 1.76/0.71 # Backward-rewritten : 12
% 1.76/0.71 # Generated clauses : 8575
% 1.76/0.71 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7863
% 1.76/0.71 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.76/0.71 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.76/0.71 # Paramodulations : 8533
% 1.76/0.71 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.76/0.71 # NegExts : 0
% 1.76/0.71 # Equation resolutions : 42
% 1.76/0.71 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.76/0.71 # Total rewrite steps : 6058
% 1.76/0.71 # ...of those cached : 5637
% 1.76/0.71 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.76/0.71 # Propositional check models : 0
% 1.76/0.71 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.76/0.71 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.76/0.71 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.76/0.71 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.76/0.71 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.76/0.71 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.76/0.71 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.76/0.71 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.76/0.71 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.76/0.71 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.76/0.71 # Current number of processed clauses : 707
% 1.76/0.71 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 170
% 1.76/0.71 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 1.76/0.71 # Negative unit clauses : 76
% 1.76/0.71 # Non-unit-clauses : 458
% 1.76/0.71 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7063
% 1.76/0.71 # ...number of literals in the above : 25760
% 1.76/0.71 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.76/0.71 # Current number of archived clauses : 496
% 1.76/0.71 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 45843
% 1.76/0.71 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20835
% 1.76/0.71 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 185
% 1.76/0.71 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4103
% 1.76/0.71 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.76/0.71 # BW rewrite match attempts : 39
% 1.76/0.71 # BW rewrite match successes : 26
% 1.76/0.71 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.76/0.71 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.76/0.71 # Termbank termtop insertions : 165755
% 1.76/0.71 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1026
% 1.76/0.71
% 1.76/0.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.76/0.71 # User time : 0.186 s
% 1.76/0.71 # System time : 0.013 s
% 1.76/0.71 # Total time : 0.199 s
% 1.76/0.71 # Maximum resident set size: 2760 pages
% 1.76/0.71
% 1.76/0.71 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.76/0.71 # User time : 0.911 s
% 1.76/0.71 # System time : 0.051 s
% 1.76/0.71 # Total time : 0.961 s
% 1.76/0.71 # Maximum resident set size: 2064 pages
% 1.76/0.71 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------