TSTP Solution File: ALG300-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : ALG300-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 18:06:03 EDT 2024
% Result : Satisfiable 0.16s 0.42s
% Output : Saturation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_2)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
product(product(product(product(X1,X1),X1),X2),product(X1,X3)) = X2,
sos01,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
tptp1 != tptp0,
c_0_2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
product(product(product(product(product(product(product(X1,X1),X1),X2),product(product(product(X1,X1),X1),X2)),product(product(product(X1,X1),X1),X2)),X3),X2) = X3,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10 % Problem : ALG300-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.05/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Sat May 18 23:01:22 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.42 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.16/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 31222 completed with status 1
% 0.16/0.42 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.16/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.42 # Search class: FUUPF-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.42 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting G-E--_209_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with 416s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 234s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 234s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 234s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # G-E--_209_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with pid 31229 completed with status 1
% 0.16/0.42 # Result found by G-E--_209_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y
% 0.16/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.42 # Search class: FUUPF-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.42 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.42 # Starting G-E--_209_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with 416s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.42
% 0.16/0.42 # No proof found!
% 0.16/0.42 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.16/0.42 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.42 # Parsed axioms : 2
% 0.16/0.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Initial clauses : 2
% 0.16/0.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2
% 0.16/0.42 # Processed clauses : 3
% 0.16/0.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 3
% 0.16/0.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Generated clauses : 2
% 0.16/0.42 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.16/0.42 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Paramodulations : 2
% 0.16/0.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.16/0.42 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.16/0.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.16/0.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.16/0.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.16/0.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 110
% 0.16/0.42 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.16/0.42
% 0.16/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.42 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.42 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.16/0.42 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1536 pages
% 0.16/0.42
% 0.16/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.42 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.16/0.42 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.42 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.16/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.16/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.16/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------