TSTP Solution File: ALG258^2 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : ALG258^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 18:05:54 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.43s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.43s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 26
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 50 ( 19 unt; 19 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 74 ( 61 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 363 ( 8 ~; 5 |; 6 &; 314 @)
% ( 6 <=>; 24 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 20 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 2 usr)
% Number of type conns : 43 ( 43 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 19 ( 17 usr; 11 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 120 ( 14 ^ 106 !; 0 ?; 120 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
term: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort2,type,
subst: $tType ).
thf(decl_22,type,
one: term ).
thf(decl_24,type,
lam: term > term ).
thf(decl_25,type,
sub: term > subst > term ).
thf(decl_26,type,
id: subst ).
thf(decl_27,type,
sh: subst ).
thf(decl_28,type,
push: term > subst > subst ).
thf(decl_29,type,
comp: subst > subst > subst ).
thf(decl_53,type,
hoaslaminj: $o ).
thf(decl_91,type,
hoaslaminj_lthm: $o ).
thf(decl_92,type,
axvarcons: $o ).
thf(decl_93,type,
hoaslam: subst > ( subst > term > term ) > term ).
thf(decl_98,type,
laminj: $o ).
thf(decl_136,type,
axshiftcons: $o ).
thf(decl_144,type,
esk1_0: subst > term > term ).
thf(decl_145,type,
esk2_0: subst > term > term ).
thf(decl_146,type,
esk3_0: subst ).
thf(decl_147,type,
esk4_0: term ).
thf(hoaslaminj,axiom,
( hoaslaminj
<=> ! [X12: subst > term > term] :
( ! [X3: subst,X1: term,X4: subst] :
( ( sub @ ( X12 @ X3 @ X1 ) @ X4 )
= ( X12 @ ( comp @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( sub @ X1 @ X4 ) ) )
=> ! [X13: subst > term > term] :
( ! [X3: subst,X1: term,X4: subst] :
( ( sub @ ( X13 @ X3 @ X1 ) @ X4 )
= ( X13 @ ( comp @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( sub @ X1 @ X4 ) ) )
=> ( ( ( hoaslam @ id
@ ^ [X3: subst,X1: term] : ( X12 @ X3 @ X1 ) )
= ( hoaslam @ id
@ ^ [X3: subst,X1: term] : ( X13 @ X3 @ X1 ) ) )
=> ! [X3: subst,X1: term] :
( ( X12 @ X3 @ X1 )
= ( X13 @ X3 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/ALG003^0.ax',hoaslaminj) ).
thf(hoaslaminj_lthm,axiom,
( hoaslaminj_lthm
<=> ( axvarcons
=> ( axshiftcons
=> ( laminj
=> hoaslaminj ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/ALG003^0.ax',hoaslaminj_lthm) ).
thf(axvarcons,axiom,
( axvarcons
<=> ! [X1: term,X3: subst] :
( ( sub @ one @ ( push @ X1 @ X3 ) )
= X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/ALG003^0.ax',axvarcons) ).
thf(axshiftcons,axiom,
( axshiftcons
<=> ! [X1: term,X3: subst] :
( ( comp @ sh @ ( push @ X1 @ X3 ) )
= X3 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/ALG003^0.ax',axshiftcons) ).
thf(laminj,axiom,
( laminj
<=> ! [X1: term,X2: term] :
( ( ( lam @ X1 )
= ( lam @ X2 ) )
=> ( X1 = X2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/ALG003^0.ax',laminj) ).
thf(thm,conjecture,
hoaslaminj_lthm,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm) ).
thf(hoaslam,axiom,
( hoaslam
= ( ^ [X3: subst,X12: subst > term > term] : ( lam @ ( X12 @ sh @ one ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/ALG003^0.ax',hoaslam) ).
thf(c_0_7,plain,
( hoaslaminj
<=> ! [X12: subst > term > term] :
( ! [X3: subst,X1: term,X4: subst] :
( ( sub @ ( X12 @ X3 @ X1 ) @ X4 )
= ( X12 @ ( comp @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( sub @ X1 @ X4 ) ) )
=> ! [X13: subst > term > term] :
( ! [X3: subst,X1: term,X4: subst] :
( ( sub @ ( X13 @ X3 @ X1 ) @ X4 )
= ( X13 @ ( comp @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( sub @ X1 @ X4 ) ) )
=> ( ( ( hoaslam @ id
@ ^ [Z0: subst,Z1: term] : ( X12 @ Z0 @ Z1 ) )
= ( hoaslam @ id
@ ^ [Z0: subst,Z1: term] : ( X13 @ Z0 @ Z1 ) ) )
=> ! [X3: subst,X1: term] :
( ( X12 @ X3 @ X1 )
= ( X13 @ X3 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[hoaslaminj]) ).
thf(c_0_8,axiom,
( hoaslaminj_lthm
= ( ! [X1897: term,X1898: subst] :
( ( sub @ one @ ( push @ X1897 @ X1898 ) )
= X1897 )
=> ( ! [X1899: term,X1900: subst] :
( ( comp @ sh @ ( push @ X1899 @ X1900 ) )
= X1900 )
=> ( ! [X1901: term,X1902: term] :
( ( ( lam @ X1901 )
= ( lam @ X1902 ) )
=> ( X1901 = X1902 ) )
=> ! [X1903: subst > term > term] :
( ! [X1904: subst,X1905: term,X1906: subst] :
( ( sub @ ( X1903 @ X1904 @ X1905 ) @ X1906 )
= ( X1903 @ ( comp @ X1904 @ X1906 ) @ ( sub @ X1905 @ X1906 ) ) )
=> ! [X1907: subst > term > term] :
( ! [X1908: subst,X1909: term,X1910: subst] :
( ( sub @ ( X1907 @ X1908 @ X1909 ) @ X1910 )
= ( X1907 @ ( comp @ X1908 @ X1910 ) @ ( sub @ X1909 @ X1910 ) ) )
=> ( ( ( hoaslam @ id
@ ^ [Z0: subst,Z1: term] : ( X1903 @ Z0 @ Z1 ) )
= ( hoaslam @ id
@ ^ [Z0: subst,Z1: term] : ( X1907 @ Z0 @ Z1 ) ) )
=> ! [X1911: subst,X1912: term] :
( ( X1903 @ X1911 @ X1912 )
= ( X1907 @ X1911 @ X1912 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[hoaslaminj_lthm,axvarcons]),axshiftcons]),laminj]),c_0_7]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X3373: term,X3374: subst] :
( ( sub @ one @ ( push @ X3373 @ X3374 ) )
= X3373 )
=> ( ! [X3375: term,X3376: subst] :
( ( comp @ sh @ ( push @ X3375 @ X3376 ) )
= X3376 )
=> ( ! [X3377: term,X3378: term] :
( ( ( lam @ X3377 )
= ( lam @ X3378 ) )
=> ( X3377 = X3378 ) )
=> ! [X3379: subst > term > term] :
( ! [X3380: subst,X3381: term,X3382: subst] :
( ( sub @ ( X3379 @ X3380 @ X3381 ) @ X3382 )
= ( X3379 @ ( comp @ X3380 @ X3382 ) @ ( sub @ X3381 @ X3382 ) ) )
=> ! [X3383: subst > term > term] :
( ! [X3384: subst,X3385: term,X3386: subst] :
( ( sub @ ( X3383 @ X3384 @ X3385 ) @ X3386 )
= ( X3383 @ ( comp @ X3384 @ X3386 ) @ ( sub @ X3385 @ X3386 ) ) )
=> ( ( ( hoaslam @ id @ X3379 )
= ( hoaslam @ id @ X3383 ) )
=> ! [X3387: subst,X3388: term] :
( ( X3379 @ X3387 @ X3388 )
= ( X3383 @ X3387 @ X3388 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm]),c_0_8])]) ).
thf(c_0_10,plain,
! [X3393: subst,X3394: subst > term > term] :
( ( hoaslam @ X3393 @ X3394 )
= ( lam @ ( X3394 @ sh @ one ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[hoaslam])]) ).
thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
! [X3401: term,X3402: subst,X3403: term,X3404: subst,X3405: term,X3406: term,X3408: subst,X3409: term,X3410: subst,X3412: subst,X3413: term,X3414: subst] :
( ( ( sub @ one @ ( push @ X3401 @ X3402 ) )
= X3401 )
& ( ( comp @ sh @ ( push @ X3403 @ X3404 ) )
= X3404 )
& ( ( ( lam @ X3405 )
!= ( lam @ X3406 ) )
| ( X3405 = X3406 ) )
& ( ( sub @ ( esk1_0 @ X3408 @ X3409 ) @ X3410 )
= ( esk1_0 @ ( comp @ X3408 @ X3410 ) @ ( sub @ X3409 @ X3410 ) ) )
& ( ( sub @ ( esk2_0 @ X3412 @ X3413 ) @ X3414 )
= ( esk2_0 @ ( comp @ X3412 @ X3414 ) @ ( sub @ X3413 @ X3414 ) ) )
& ( ( hoaslam @ id @ esk1_0 )
= ( hoaslam @ id @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 )
!= ( esk2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_12,plain,
! [X3399: subst,X3400: subst > term > term] :
( ( hoaslam @ X3399 @ X3400 )
= ( lam @ ( X3400 @ sh @ one ) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: term,X2: term] :
( ( X1 = X2 )
| ( ( lam @ X1 )
!= ( lam @ X2 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_14,plain,
! [X3: subst,X12: subst > term > term] :
( ( hoaslam @ X3 @ X12 )
= ( lam @ ( X12 @ sh @ one ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
! [X12: subst > term > term,X3: subst,X1: term] :
( ( ( X12 @ sh @ one )
= X1 )
| ( ( hoaslam @ X3 @ X12 )
!= ( lam @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ( hoaslam @ id @ esk1_0 )
= ( hoaslam @ id @ esk2_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: term,X3: subst,X4: subst] :
( ( sub @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X1 ) @ X4 )
= ( esk1_0 @ ( comp @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( sub @ X1 @ X4 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: subst,X1: term] :
( ( sub @ one @ ( push @ X1 @ X3 ) )
= X1 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: term] :
( ( ( esk1_0 @ sh @ one )
= X1 )
| ( ( hoaslam @ id @ esk2_0 )
!= ( lam @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: term,X3: subst,X4: subst] :
( ( sub @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X1 ) @ X4 )
= ( esk2_0 @ ( comp @ X3 @ X4 ) @ ( sub @ X1 @ X4 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: term,X3: subst,X4: subst] :
( ( esk1_0 @ ( comp @ X3 @ ( push @ X1 @ X4 ) ) @ X1 )
= ( sub @ ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ one ) @ ( push @ X1 @ X4 ) ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: term,X3: subst] :
( ( comp @ sh @ ( push @ X1 @ X3 ) )
= X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: subst,X12: subst > term > term] :
( ( ( esk1_0 @ sh @ one )
= ( X12 @ sh @ one ) )
| ( ( hoaslam @ id @ esk2_0 )
!= ( hoaslam @ X3 @ X12 ) ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_14]) ).
thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: term,X3: subst,X4: subst] :
( ( esk2_0 @ ( comp @ X3 @ ( push @ X1 @ X4 ) ) @ X1 )
= ( sub @ ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ one ) @ ( push @ X1 @ X4 ) ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_18]) ).
thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: subst,X1: term] :
( ( sub @ ( esk1_0 @ sh @ one ) @ ( push @ X1 @ X3 ) )
= ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X1 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( ( esk1_0 @ sh @ one )
= ( esk2_0 @ sh @ one ) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: subst,X1: term] :
( ( sub @ ( esk2_0 @ sh @ one ) @ ( push @ X1 @ X3 ) )
= ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X1 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_22]) ).
thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 )
!= ( esk2_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: subst,X1: term] :
( ( esk1_0 @ X3 @ X1 )
= ( esk2_0 @ X3 @ X1 ) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).
thf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : ALG258^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Sat May 18 22:54:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.51 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/0.57 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.43/0.57 # Preprocessing class: HSMMSLSSLLLNHFA.
% 0.43/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.43/0.57 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.43/0.57 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.43/0.57 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.43/0.57 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.43/0.57 # post_as_ho1 with pid 11249 completed with status 0
% 0.43/0.57 # Result found by post_as_ho1
% 0.43/0.57 # Preprocessing class: HSMMSLSSLLLNHFA.
% 0.43/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.43/0.57 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.43/0.57 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.43/0.57 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.43/0.57 # Search class: HHUPM-FFSF32-SHFMMFNN
% 0.43/0.57 # partial match(1): HHUPS-FFSF32-SHFMMFNN
% 0.43/0.57 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.43/0.57 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.43/0.57 # new_ho_10 with pid 11253 completed with status 0
% 0.43/0.57 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.43/0.57 # Preprocessing class: HSMMSLSSLLLNHFA.
% 0.43/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.43/0.57 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.43/0.57 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.43/0.57 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.43/0.57 # Search class: HHUPM-FFSF32-SHFMMFNN
% 0.43/0.57 # partial match(1): HHUPS-FFSF32-SHFMMFNN
% 0.43/0.57 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.43/0.57 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.43/0.57 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.43/0.57 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.43/0.57
% 0.43/0.57 # Proof found!
% 0.43/0.57 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.43/0.57 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.43/0.57 # Parsed axioms : 238
% 0.43/0.57 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.43/0.57 # Initial clauses : 133
% 0.43/0.57 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 124
% 0.43/0.57 # Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.43/0.57 # Processed clauses : 54
% 0.43/0.57 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.43/0.57 # ...subsumed : 16
% 0.43/0.57 # ...remaining for further processing : 35
% 0.43/0.57 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.43/0.57 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.43/0.57 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.43/0.57 # Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.43/0.57 # Generated clauses : 91
% 0.43/0.57 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 87
% 0.43/0.57 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.43/0.57 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.43/0.57 # Paramodulations : 82
% 0.43/0.57 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.43/0.57 # NegExts : 0
% 0.43/0.57 # Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.43/0.57 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.43/0.57 # Total rewrite steps : 30
% 0.43/0.57 # ...of those cached : 10
% 0.43/0.57 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.43/0.57 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.43/0.57 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.43/0.57 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.43/0.57 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.43/0.57 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.43/0.57 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.43/0.57 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.43/0.57 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.43/0.57 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.43/0.57 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.43/0.57 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.43/0.57 # Current number of processed clauses : 17
% 0.43/0.57 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 0.43/0.57 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 5
% 0.43/0.57 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.43/0.57 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.43/0.57 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 49
% 0.43/0.57 # ...number of literals in the above : 81
% 0.43/0.57 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.43/0.57 # Current number of archived clauses : 18
% 0.43/0.57 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7
% 0.43/0.57 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.43/0.57 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5
% 0.43/0.57 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.43/0.57 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.43/0.57 # BW rewrite match attempts : 27
% 0.43/0.57 # BW rewrite match successes : 21
% 0.43/0.57 # Condensation attempts : 54
% 0.43/0.57 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.43/0.57 # Termbank termtop insertions : 27622
% 0.43/0.57 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1830
% 0.43/0.57
% 0.43/0.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.43/0.57 # User time : 0.031 s
% 0.43/0.57 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.43/0.57 # Total time : 0.042 s
% 0.43/0.57 # Maximum resident set size: 5820 pages
% 0.43/0.57
% 0.43/0.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.43/0.57 # User time : 0.042 s
% 0.43/0.57 # System time : 0.012 s
% 0.43/0.57 # Total time : 0.054 s
% 0.43/0.57 # Maximum resident set size: 2072 pages
% 0.43/0.57 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.43/0.57 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------