TSTP Solution File: ALG233+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : ALG233+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 18:01:25 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.03s 300.23s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : ALG233+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 06:43:53 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.37 The process was started by sandbox2 on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.37 Thu Jun 9 06:43:53 2022
% 0.20/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 13009.
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.37 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.37 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.37 clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.37 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v1_xboole_0(A)| -m1_pboole(B,A)| -v3_relat_1(B)| -v2_relat_1(B).
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -m1_pboole(A,B)| -m1_subset_1(C,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_closure2(B,A)))| -v4_closure2(C,B,A)|v1_fraenkel(C).
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -m1_pboole(A,B)| -m1_subset_1(C,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_closure2(B,A)))| -v2_closure2(C,B,A)|v1_fraenkel(C).
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.37 208 back subsumes 147.
% 0.20/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 210 during input processing: 0 [copy,210,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.37 210 back subsumes 152.
% 0.20/0.37 210 back subsumes 151.
% 0.20/0.37 210 back subsumes 150.
% 0.20/0.37
% 0.20/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.74/1.94 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.74/1.94 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.74/1.94 number of clauses in intial UL: 140
% 1.74/1.94 number of clauses initially in problem: 196
% 1.74/1.94 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 71
% 1.74/1.94 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 82
% 1.74/1.94 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 1.74/1.94 absolute distinct symbol count: 81
% 1.74/1.94 distinct predicate count: 26
% 1.74/1.94 distinct function count: 39
% 1.74/1.94 distinct constant count: 16
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 =========== start of search ===========
% 300.03/300.23 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------