TSTP Solution File: ALG230+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : ALG230+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 18:01:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.07s 300.27s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : ALG230+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Jun  8 03:29:20 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.41  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.41  The process was started by sandbox on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.41  Wed Jun  8 03:29:21 2022
% 0.21/0.41  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 20680.
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.41  set(auto).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.41  clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  formula_list(usable).
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.21/0.41  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.21/0.41  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.21/0.41  clauses in usable.
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.21/0.41     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.41    Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v1_xboole_0(A)| -m1_pboole(B,A)| -v3_relat_1(B)| -v2_relat_1(B).
% 0.21/0.41    Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -m1_pboole(A,B)| -m1_subset_1(C,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_closure2(B,A)))| -v4_closure2(C,B,A)|v1_fraenkel(C).
% 0.21/0.41    Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -m1_pboole(A,B)| -m1_subset_1(C,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_closure2(B,A)))| -v2_closure2(C,B,A)|v1_fraenkel(C).
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.41    Following clause subsumed by 188 during input processing: 0 [copy,188,flip.1] {-} k2_xboole_0(A,B)=k2_xboole_0(B,A).
% 0.21/0.41    Following clause subsumed by 241 during input processing: 0 [copy,241,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.21/0.41  241 back subsumes 183.
% 0.21/0.41  241 back subsumes 182.
% 0.21/0.41  241 back subsumes 181.
% 0.21/0.41  241 back subsumes 180.
% 0.21/0.41  241 back subsumes 179.
% 0.21/0.41  241 back subsumes 152.
% 0.21/0.41  241 back subsumes 151.
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.78/1.01  
% 0.78/1.01  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.78/1.01  
% 0.78/1.01  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.78/1.01  
% 0.78/1.01  
% 0.78/1.01  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.78/1.01  
% 0.78/1.01  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.78/1.01  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.78/1.01  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.78/1.01  number of clauses in intial UL: 163
% 0.78/1.01  number of clauses initially in problem: 226
% 0.78/1.01  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 72
% 0.78/1.01  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 82
% 0.78/1.01  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.78/1.01  absolute distinct symbol count: 79
% 0.78/1.01     distinct predicate count: 25
% 0.78/1.01     distinct function count: 39
% 0.78/1.01     distinct constant count: 15
% 0.78/1.01  
% 0.78/1.01  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.78/1.01  
% 0.78/1.01  
% 0.78/1.01  
% 0.78/1.01  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.78/1.01  
% 0.78/1.01  =========== start of search ===========
% 300.07/300.27  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------