TSTP Solution File: ALG227+2 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : ALG227+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 16:50:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.38s 126.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  118 (  34 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   18 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  128 (  49   ~;  51   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   55 (   2 sgn  31   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d5_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( v1_xboole_0(X1)
    <=> X1 = k1_xboole_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+2.ax',d5_xboole_0) ).

fof(t51_card_1,axiom,
    np__0 = k1_xboole_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+54.ax',t51_card_1) ).

fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ? [X1] : v1_xboole_0(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+2.ax',rc1_xboole_0) ).

fof(fraenkel_a_2_0_closure3,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
        & m1_pboole(X3,X2) )
     => ( r2_hidden(X1,a_2_0_closure3(X2,X3))
      <=> ? [X4] :
            ( m1_subset_1(X4,X2)
            & X1 = X4
            & k1_funct_1(X3,X4) != k1_xboole_0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fraenkel_a_2_0_closure3) ).

fof(t8_closure3,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_pboole(X2,X1)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( m1_subset_1(X3,X1)
             => ( ~ r2_hidden(X3,k1_closure3(X1,X2))
               => k1_funct_1(X2,X3) = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t8_closure3) ).

fof(t1_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
     => m1_subset_1(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+9.ax',t1_subset) ).

fof(t2_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
     => ( v1_xboole_0(X2)
        | r2_hidden(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+9.ax',t2_subset) ).

fof(d3_closure3,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_pboole(X2,X1)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( X3 = k1_closure3(X1,X2)
            <=> X3 = a_2_0_closure3(X1,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d3_closure3) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X2,X2] :
      ( ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
        | X2 = k1_xboole_0 )
      & ( X2 != k1_xboole_0
        | v1_xboole_0(X2) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_xboole_0])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( X1 = k1_xboole_0
    | ~ v1_xboole_0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    np__0 = k1_xboole_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[t51_card_1]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    v1_xboole_0(esk25_0),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[rc1_xboole_0])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X9] :
      ( ( m1_subset_1(esk1337_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
        | ~ r2_hidden(X5,a_2_0_closure3(X6,X7))
        | v1_xboole_0(X6)
        | ~ m1_pboole(X7,X6) )
      & ( X5 = esk1337_3(X5,X6,X7)
        | ~ r2_hidden(X5,a_2_0_closure3(X6,X7))
        | v1_xboole_0(X6)
        | ~ m1_pboole(X7,X6) )
      & ( k1_funct_1(X7,esk1337_3(X5,X6,X7)) != k1_xboole_0
        | ~ r2_hidden(X5,a_2_0_closure3(X6,X7))
        | v1_xboole_0(X6)
        | ~ m1_pboole(X7,X6) )
      & ( ~ m1_subset_1(X9,X6)
        | X5 != X9
        | k1_funct_1(X7,X9) = k1_xboole_0
        | r2_hidden(X5,a_2_0_closure3(X6,X7))
        | v1_xboole_0(X6)
        | ~ m1_pboole(X7,X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fraenkel_a_2_0_closure3])])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( X1 = np__0
    | ~ v1_xboole_0(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    v1_xboole_0(esk25_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( m1_pboole(X2,X1)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( m1_subset_1(X3,X1)
               => ( ~ r2_hidden(X3,k1_closure3(X1,X2))
                 => k1_funct_1(X2,X3) = k1_xboole_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t8_closure3]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( v1_xboole_0(X2)
    | r2_hidden(X3,a_2_0_closure3(X2,X1))
    | k1_funct_1(X1,X4) = k1_xboole_0
    | ~ m1_pboole(X1,X2)
    | X3 != X4
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    np__0 = esk25_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ r2_hidden(X3,X4)
      | m1_subset_1(X3,X4) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t1_subset])]) ).

fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ v1_xboole_0(esk1343_0)
    & m1_pboole(esk1344_0,esk1343_0)
    & m1_subset_1(esk1345_0,esk1343_0)
    & ~ r2_hidden(esk1345_0,k1_closure3(esk1343_0,esk1344_0))
    & k1_funct_1(esk1344_0,esk1345_0) != k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( k1_funct_1(X1,X2) = esk25_0
    | v1_xboole_0(X3)
    | r2_hidden(X2,a_2_0_closure3(X3,X1))
    | ~ m1_pboole(X1,X3)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,X3) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_10])]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ m1_subset_1(X3,X4)
      | v1_xboole_0(X4)
      | r2_hidden(X3,X4) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t2_subset])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    k1_funct_1(esk1344_0,esk1345_0) != k1_xboole_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( k1_funct_1(X1,X2) = esk25_0
    | v1_xboole_0(X3)
    | r2_hidden(X2,a_2_0_closure3(X3,X1))
    | ~ m1_pboole(X1,X3)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    m1_pboole(esk1344_0,esk1343_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v1_xboole_0(esk1343_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | v1_xboole_0(X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk1345_0,esk1343_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    k1_funct_1(esk1344_0,esk1345_0) != np__0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X6] :
      ( ( X6 != k1_closure3(X4,X5)
        | X6 = a_2_0_closure3(X4,X5)
        | ~ m1_pboole(X5,X4)
        | v1_xboole_0(X4) )
      & ( X6 != a_2_0_closure3(X4,X5)
        | X6 = k1_closure3(X4,X5)
        | ~ m1_pboole(X5,X4)
        | v1_xboole_0(X4) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d3_closure3])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( k1_funct_1(esk1344_0,X1) = esk25_0
    | r2_hidden(X1,a_2_0_closure3(esk1343_0,esk1344_0))
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,esk1343_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    r2_hidden(esk1345_0,esk1343_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    k1_funct_1(esk1344_0,esk1345_0) != esk25_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( v1_xboole_0(X1)
    | X3 = a_2_0_closure3(X1,X2)
    | ~ m1_pboole(X2,X1)
    | X3 != k1_closure3(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    r2_hidden(esk1345_0,a_2_0_closure3(esk1343_0,esk1344_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( a_2_0_closure3(X1,X2) = k1_closure3(X1,X2)
    | v1_xboole_0(X1)
    | ~ m1_pboole(X2,X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r2_hidden(esk1345_0,k1_closure3(esk1343_0,esk1344_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_25])]),c_0_37]),c_0_26]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : ALG227+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun  8 02:02:22 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.63/23.65  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.63/23.65  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.63/23.66  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.63/23.66  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.80/46.67  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.80/46.67  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.80/46.68  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.80/46.70  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.97/69.69  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.97/69.70  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.97/69.71  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.97/69.71  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.14/92.72  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.14/92.72  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.14/92.73  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.14/92.73  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.30/115.74  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.30/115.75  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.30/115.75  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.30/115.76  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.38/126.56  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 1.38/126.56  
% 1.38/126.56  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.38/126.56  # OLD status Res
% 1.38/126.56  # Preprocessing time       : 0.867 s
% 1.38/126.56  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f6eb5f7f05126ea361481ae651a4823314e3d740 for 23 seconds:
% 1.38/126.56  
% 1.38/126.56  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.38/126.56  # OLD status Res
% 1.38/126.56  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 1.38/126.56  # Preprocessing time       : 0.110 s
% 1.38/126.56  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_a172c605141d0894bf6fdc293a5220c6c2a32117 for 23 seconds:
% 1.38/126.56  
% 1.38/126.56  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.38/126.56  # OLD status Res
% 1.38/126.56  # Preprocessing time       : 0.845 s
% 1.38/126.56  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f8b0f932169414d689b89e2a8b18d4600533b975 for 23 seconds:
% 1.38/126.56  
% 1.38/126.56  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.38/126.56  # OLD status Res
% 1.38/126.56  # Preprocessing time       : 0.819 s
% 1.38/126.56  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_fc511518e5f98a6b2c7baef820b71b6d1abb3e55 for 23 seconds:
% 1.38/126.56  
% 1.38/126.56  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.38/126.56  # OLD status Res
% 1.38/126.56  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,02,80,1.0)
% 1.38/126.56  # Preprocessing time       : 0.168 s
% 1.38/126.56  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_95b56b3f38545d2cfee43b45856d192a814b65d5 for 23 seconds:
% 1.38/126.56  # Preprocessing time       : 0.761 s
% 1.38/126.56  
% 1.38/126.56  # Proof found!
% 1.38/126.56  # SZS status Theorem
% 1.38/126.56  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.38/126.56  # Proof object total steps             : 39
% 1.38/126.56  # Proof object clause steps            : 23
% 1.38/126.56  # Proof object formula steps           : 16
% 1.38/126.56  # Proof object conjectures             : 14
% 1.38/126.56  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 11
% 1.38/126.56  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 1.38/126.56  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 12
% 1.38/126.56  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 8
% 1.38/126.56  # Proof object generating inferences   : 7
% 1.38/126.56  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 13
% 1.38/126.56  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.38/126.56  # Parsed axioms                        : 4731
% 1.38/126.56  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 1.38/126.56  # Initial clauses                      : 11248
% 1.38/126.56  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 896
% 1.38/126.56  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 10352
% 1.38/126.56  # Processed clauses                    : 11242
% 1.38/126.56  # ...of these trivial                  : 122
% 1.38/126.56  # ...subsumed                          : 722
% 1.38/126.56  # ...remaining for further processing  : 10398
% 1.38/126.56  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1128
% 1.38/126.56  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 194349
% 1.38/126.56  # Backward-subsumed                    : 18
% 1.38/126.56  # Backward-rewritten                   : 3202
% 1.38/126.56  # Generated clauses                    : 280393
% 1.38/126.56  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 274881
% 1.38/126.56  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.38/126.56  # Paramodulations                      : 278809
% 1.38/126.56  # Factorizations                       : 39
% 1.38/126.56  # Equation resolutions                 : 1549
% 1.38/126.56  # Current number of processed clauses  : 7118
% 1.38/126.56  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 702
% 1.38/126.56  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 1.38/126.56  #    Negative unit clauses             : 179
% 1.38/126.56  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 6234
% 1.38/126.56  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 55383
% 1.38/126.56  # ...number of literals in the above   : 264910
% 1.38/126.56  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.38/126.56  # Current number of archived clauses   : 3245
% 1.38/126.56  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8397854
% 1.38/126.56  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1112385
% 1.38/126.56  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 589
% 1.38/126.56  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 443111
% 1.38/126.56  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 60
% 1.38/126.56  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3522
% 1.38/126.56  # BW rewrite match successes           : 231
% 1.38/126.56  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.38/126.56  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.38/126.56  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9568819
% 1.38/126.56  
% 1.38/126.56  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.38/126.56  # User time                : 10.438 s
% 1.38/126.56  # System time              : 0.151 s
% 1.38/126.56  # Total time               : 10.589 s
% 1.38/126.56  # Maximum resident set size: 177876 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------