TSTP Solution File: ALG202+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : ALG202+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 15:32:58 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.68s 2.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.68s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 36 ( 11 equ; 22 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( h(j(X1)) = X1
| ~ sorti2(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dt2kx6fy/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( op1(j(X1),j(X2)) = j(op2(X1,X2))
| ~ sorti2(X2)
| ~ sorti2(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dt2kx6fy/lgb.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
( sorti2(op2(X1,X2))
| ~ sorti2(X2)
| ~ sorti2(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dt2kx6fy/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
op2(esk1_0,esk1_0) != esk1_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dt2kx6fy/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_5,plain,
sorti2(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dt2kx6fy/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_3,plain,
( op1(X1,X1) = X1
| ~ sorti1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dt2kx6fy/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( sorti1(j(X1))
| ~ sorti2(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dt2kx6fy/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( h(j(X1)) = X1
| ~ sorti2(X1) ),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( op1(j(X1),j(X2)) = j(op2(X1,X2))
| ~ sorti2(X2)
| ~ sorti2(X1) ),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( sorti2(op2(X1,X2))
| ~ sorti2(X2)
| ~ sorti2(X1) ),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
op2(esk1_0,esk1_0) != esk1_0,
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( op2(X1,X2) = h(op1(j(X1),j(X2)))
| ~ sorti2(X2)
| ~ sorti2(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
sorti2(esk1_0),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
h(op1(j(esk1_0),j(esk1_0))) != esk1_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( op1(X1,X1) = X1
| ~ sorti1(X1) ),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( h(j(esk1_0)) != esk1_0
| ~ sorti1(j(esk1_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ sorti1(j(esk1_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_18]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( sorti1(j(X1))
| ~ sorti2(X1) ),
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_23])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : ALG202+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 8 10:58:36 EDT 2022
% 0.20/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.68/2.60 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.68/2.60 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.68/2.60 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.68/2.60 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 8.68/2.60 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 8.68/2.60 #
% 8.68/2.60 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 8.68/2.60 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.68/2.60
% 8.68/2.60 # Proof found!
% 8.68/2.60 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.68/2.60 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.68/2.60 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.68/2.60
% 8.68/2.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.68/2.60 # User time : 0.026 s
% 8.68/2.60 # System time : 0.004 s
% 8.68/2.60 # Total time : 0.030 s
% 8.68/2.60 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.68/2.60
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------