TSTP Solution File: ALG201+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : ALG201+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 18:02:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.43s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 22 ( 0 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
sorti2(skc1),
file('ALG201+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(2,axiom,
equal(op2(skc1,skc1),skc1),
file('ALG201+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(4,axiom,
( ~ sorti2(u)
| sorti1(j(u)) ),
file('ALG201+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(7,axiom,
( ~ sorti1(u)
| ~ equal(op1(u,u),u) ),
file('ALG201+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(11,axiom,
( ~ sorti2(u)
| ~ sorti2(v)
| equal(op1(j(v),j(u)),j(op2(v,u))) ),
file('ALG201+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(29,plain,
( ~ sorti2(u)
| ~ sorti2(u)
| ~ sorti1(j(u))
| ~ equal(j(op2(u,u)),j(u)) ),
inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[11,7]),
[iquote('0:SpL:11.2,7.1')] ).
cnf(30,plain,
( ~ sorti2(u)
| ~ sorti1(j(u))
| ~ equal(j(op2(u,u)),j(u)) ),
inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[29]),
[iquote('0:Obv:29.0')] ).
cnf(31,plain,
( ~ sorti2(u)
| ~ equal(j(op2(u,u)),j(u)) ),
inference(ssi,[status(thm)],[30,4]),
[iquote('0:SSi:30.1,4.1')] ).
cnf(35,plain,
( ~ sorti2(skc1)
| ~ equal(j(skc1),j(skc1)) ),
inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,31]),
[iquote('0:SpL:2.0,31.1')] ).
cnf(36,plain,
~ sorti2(skc1),
inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[35]),
[iquote('0:Obv:35.1')] ).
cnf(37,plain,
$false,
inference(ssi,[status(thm)],[36,1]),
[iquote('0:SSi:36.0,1.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : ALG201+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 8 11:22:47 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.43
% 0.21/0.43 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.21/0.43 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.21/0.43 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.43 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.43 SPASS derived 14 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 16 clauses.
% 0.21/0.43 SPASS allocated 103852 KBytes.
% 0.21/0.43 SPASS spent 0:00:00.08 on the problem.
% 0.21/0.43 0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.21/0.43 0:00:00.02 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.21/0.43 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.21/0.43 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.21/0.43 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.21/0.43
% 0.21/0.43
% 0.21/0.43 Here is a proof with depth 2, length 11 :
% 0.21/0.43 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.43 Formulae used in the proof : ax4 co1 ax3
% 0.21/0.43
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------