TSTP Solution File: ALG171+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : ALG171+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory   : 2006MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Dec 28 21:05:03 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 1.21s
% Output   : Solution 1.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP20588/ALG171+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP20588/ALG171+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP20588/ALG171+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 20720
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.019 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(5, axiom,(((e0=op(e4,op(e4,e4))&e1=op(e4,e4))&e2=op(op(e4,op(e4,e4)),op(e4,e4)))&e3=op(op(e4,op(e4,e4)),op(e4,op(e4,e4)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax6)).
% fof(6, axiom,(((((((((~(e0=e1)&~(e0=e2))&~(e0=e3))&~(e0=e4))&~(e1=e2))&~(e1=e3))&~(e1=e4))&~(e2=e3))&~(e2=e4))&~(e3=e4)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax5)).
% fof(7, conjecture,~((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((~(op(e0,e0)=e0)&~(op(e1,e0)=e1))&~(op(e2,e0)=e2))&~(op(e3,e0)=e3))&~(op(e4,e0)=e4))|((((~(op(e0,e1)=e0)&~(op(e1,e1)=e1))&~(op(e2,e1)=e2))&~(op(e3,e1)=e3))&~(op(e4,e1)=e4)))|((((~(op(e0,e2)=e0)&~(op(e1,e2)=e1))&~(op(e2,e2)=e2))&~(op(e3,e2)=e3))&~(op(e4,e2)=e4)))|((((~(op(e0,e3)=e0)&~(op(e1,e3)=e1))&~(op(e2,e3)=e2))&~(op(e3,e3)=e3))&~(op(e4,e3)=e4)))|((((~(op(e0,e4)=e0)&~(op(e1,e4)=e1))&~(op(e2,e4)=e2))&~(op(e3,e4)=e3))&~(op(e4,e4)=e4)))&op(e0,op(e0,e0))=e0)&op(e0,op(e0,e1))=e1)&op(e0,op(e0,e2))=e2)&op(e0,op(e0,e3))=e3)&op(e0,op(e0,e4))=e4)&op(e1,op(e1,e0))=e0)&op(e1,op(e1,e1))=e1)&op(e1,op(e1,e2))=e2)&op(e1,op(e1,e3))=e3)&op(e1,op(e1,e4))=e4)&op(e2,op(e2,e0))=e0)&op(e2,op(e2,e1))=e1)&op(e2,op(e2,e2))=e2)&op(e2,op(e2,e3))=e3)&op(e2,op(e2,e4))=e4)&op(e3,op(e3,e0))=e0)&op(e3,op(e3,e1))=e1)&op(e3,op(e3,e2))=e2)&op(e3,op(e3,e3))=e3)&op(e3,op(e3,e4))=e4)&op(e4,op(e4,e0))=e0)&op(e4,op(e4,e1))=e1)&op(e4,op(e4,e2))=e2)&op(e4,op(e4,e3))=e3)&op(e4,op(e4,e4))=e4)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', co1)).
% fof(8, negated_conjecture,~(~((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((~(op(e0,e0)=e0)&~(op(e1,e0)=e1))&~(op(e2,e0)=e2))&~(op(e3,e0)=e3))&~(op(e4,e0)=e4))|((((~(op(e0,e1)=e0)&~(op(e1,e1)=e1))&~(op(e2,e1)=e2))&~(op(e3,e1)=e3))&~(op(e4,e1)=e4)))|((((~(op(e0,e2)=e0)&~(op(e1,e2)=e1))&~(op(e2,e2)=e2))&~(op(e3,e2)=e3))&~(op(e4,e2)=e4)))|((((~(op(e0,e3)=e0)&~(op(e1,e3)=e1))&~(op(e2,e3)=e2))&~(op(e3,e3)=e3))&~(op(e4,e3)=e4)))|((((~(op(e0,e4)=e0)&~(op(e1,e4)=e1))&~(op(e2,e4)=e2))&~(op(e3,e4)=e3))&~(op(e4,e4)=e4)))&op(e0,op(e0,e0))=e0)&op(e0,op(e0,e1))=e1)&op(e0,op(e0,e2))=e2)&op(e0,op(e0,e3))=e3)&op(e0,op(e0,e4))=e4)&op(e1,op(e1,e0))=e0)&op(e1,op(e1,e1))=e1)&op(e1,op(e1,e2))=e2)&op(e1,op(e1,e3))=e3)&op(e1,op(e1,e4))=e4)&op(e2,op(e2,e0))=e0)&op(e2,op(e2,e1))=e1)&op(e2,op(e2,e2))=e2)&op(e2,op(e2,e3))=e3)&op(e2,op(e2,e4))=e4)&op(e3,op(e3,e0))=e0)&op(e3,op(e3,e1))=e1)&op(e3,op(e3,e2))=e2)&op(e3,op(e3,e3))=e3)&op(e3,op(e3,e4))=e4)&op(e4,op(e4,e0))=e0)&op(e4,op(e4,e1))=e1)&op(e4,op(e4,e2))=e2)&op(e4,op(e4,e3))=e3)&op(e4,op(e4,e4))=e4))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[7])).
% fof(10, plain,(epred2_0=>(((((((~(op(e0,e0)=e0)&~(op(e1,e0)=e1))&~(op(e2,e0)=e2))&~(op(e3,e0)=e3))&~(op(e4,e0)=e4))|((((~(op(e0,e1)=e0)&~(op(e1,e1)=e1))&~(op(e2,e1)=e2))&~(op(e3,e1)=e3))&~(op(e4,e1)=e4)))|((((~(op(e0,e2)=e0)&~(op(e1,e2)=e1))&~(op(e2,e2)=e2))&~(op(e3,e2)=e3))&~(op(e4,e2)=e4)))|((((~(op(e0,e3)=e0)&~(op(e1,e3)=e1))&~(op(e2,e3)=e2))&~(op(e3,e3)=e3))&~(op(e4,e3)=e4)))),introduced(definition)).
% fof(11, negated_conjecture,~(~(((((((((((((((((((((((((((epred2_0|((((~(op(e0,e4)=e0)&~(op(e1,e4)=e1))&~(op(e2,e4)=e2))&~(op(e3,e4)=e3))&~(op(e4,e4)=e4)))&op(e0,op(e0,e0))=e0)&op(e0,op(e0,e1))=e1)&op(e0,op(e0,e2))=e2)&op(e0,op(e0,e3))=e3)&op(e0,op(e0,e4))=e4)&op(e1,op(e1,e0))=e0)&op(e1,op(e1,e1))=e1)&op(e1,op(e1,e2))=e2)&op(e1,op(e1,e3))=e3)&op(e1,op(e1,e4))=e4)&op(e2,op(e2,e0))=e0)&op(e2,op(e2,e1))=e1)&op(e2,op(e2,e2))=e2)&op(e2,op(e2,e3))=e3)&op(e2,op(e2,e4))=e4)&op(e3,op(e3,e0))=e0)&op(e3,op(e3,e1))=e1)&op(e3,op(e3,e2))=e2)&op(e3,op(e3,e3))=e3)&op(e3,op(e3,e4))=e4)&op(e4,op(e4,e0))=e0)&op(e4,op(e4,e1))=e1)&op(e4,op(e4,e2))=e2)&op(e4,op(e4,e3))=e3)&op(e4,op(e4,e4))=e4))),inference(apply_def,[status(esa)],[8,10,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(215,plain,(e1=op(e4,e4)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[5])).
% cnf(216,plain,(e0=op(e4,op(e4,e4))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[5])).
% cnf(223,plain,(e0!=e4),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[6])).
% fof(227, negated_conjecture,((((((((((((((((((((((((((epred2_0|((((~(op(e0,e4)=e0)&~(op(e1,e4)=e1))&~(op(e2,e4)=e2))&~(op(e3,e4)=e3))&~(op(e4,e4)=e4)))&op(e0,op(e0,e0))=e0)&op(e0,op(e0,e1))=e1)&op(e0,op(e0,e2))=e2)&op(e0,op(e0,e3))=e3)&op(e0,op(e0,e4))=e4)&op(e1,op(e1,e0))=e0)&op(e1,op(e1,e1))=e1)&op(e1,op(e1,e2))=e2)&op(e1,op(e1,e3))=e3)&op(e1,op(e1,e4))=e4)&op(e2,op(e2,e0))=e0)&op(e2,op(e2,e1))=e1)&op(e2,op(e2,e2))=e2)&op(e2,op(e2,e3))=e3)&op(e2,op(e2,e4))=e4)&op(e3,op(e3,e0))=e0)&op(e3,op(e3,e1))=e1)&op(e3,op(e3,e2))=e2)&op(e3,op(e3,e3))=e3)&op(e3,op(e3,e4))=e4)&op(e4,op(e4,e0))=e0)&op(e4,op(e4,e1))=e1)&op(e4,op(e4,e2))=e2)&op(e4,op(e4,e3))=e3)&op(e4,op(e4,e4))=e4),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[11])).
% fof(228, negated_conjecture,((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((~(op(e0,e4)=e0)|epred2_0)&(~(op(e1,e4)=e1)|epred2_0))&(~(op(e2,e4)=e2)|epred2_0))&(~(op(e3,e4)=e3)|epred2_0))&(~(op(e4,e4)=e4)|epred2_0))&op(e0,op(e0,e0))=e0)&op(e0,op(e0,e1))=e1)&op(e0,op(e0,e2))=e2)&op(e0,op(e0,e3))=e3)&op(e0,op(e0,e4))=e4)&op(e1,op(e1,e0))=e0)&op(e1,op(e1,e1))=e1)&op(e1,op(e1,e2))=e2)&op(e1,op(e1,e3))=e3)&op(e1,op(e1,e4))=e4)&op(e2,op(e2,e0))=e0)&op(e2,op(e2,e1))=e1)&op(e2,op(e2,e2))=e2)&op(e2,op(e2,e3))=e3)&op(e2,op(e2,e4))=e4)&op(e3,op(e3,e0))=e0)&op(e3,op(e3,e1))=e1)&op(e3,op(e3,e2))=e2)&op(e3,op(e3,e3))=e3)&op(e3,op(e3,e4))=e4)&op(e4,op(e4,e0))=e0)&op(e4,op(e4,e1))=e1)&op(e4,op(e4,e2))=e2)&op(e4,op(e4,e3))=e3)&op(e4,op(e4,e4))=e4),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[227])).
% cnf(229,negated_conjecture,(op(e4,op(e4,e4))=e4),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[228])).
% cnf(314,plain,(op(e4,e1)=e0),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[216,215,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(316,negated_conjecture,(e0=e4),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[229,215,theory(equality)]),314,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(317,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[316,223,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(318,negated_conjecture,($false),317,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 42
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 1
% # ...remaining for further processing: 41
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 1
% # Generated clauses                  : 0
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 0
% # Paramodulations                    : 0
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 39
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 25
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 10
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 4
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 253
% # ...number of literals in the above : 678
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 1
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 1
% # Backwards rewriting index:    55 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:           25 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           53 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.014 s
% # System time            : 0.006 s
% # Total time             : 0.020 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.13 CPU 0.19 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.13 CPU 0.19 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP20588/ALG171+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------