TSTP Solution File: ALG097+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : ALG097+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 18:01:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.02s 300.22s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : ALG097+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 00:52:34 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.18/0.37  The process was started by sandbox on n022.cluster.edu,
% 0.18/0.37  Thu Jun  9 00:52:34 2022
% 0.18/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 15524.
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.18/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.18/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  formula_list(usable).
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.18/0.37  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.18/0.37  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.18/0.37  clauses in usable.
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.18/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 577 during input processing: 0 [copy,577,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.47  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.47  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.47  number of clauses in intial UL: 250
% 0.18/0.47  number of clauses initially in problem: 347
% 0.18/0.47  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 72
% 0.18/0.47  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 87
% 0.18/0.47  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.47  absolute distinct symbol count: 8
% 0.18/0.47     distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.18/0.47     distinct function count: 1
% 0.18/0.47     distinct constant count: 6
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  =========== start of search ===========
% 12.92/13.13  
% 12.92/13.13  
% 12.92/13.13  Changing weight limit from 60 to 46.
% 12.92/13.13  
% 12.92/13.13  Resetting weight limit to 46 after 180 givens.
% 12.92/13.13  
% 13.12/13.36  
% 13.12/13.36  
% 13.12/13.36  Changing weight limit from 46 to 40.
% 13.12/13.36  
% 13.12/13.36  Resetting weight limit to 40 after 185 givens.
% 13.12/13.36  
% 13.95/14.13  
% 13.95/14.13  
% 13.95/14.13  Changing weight limit from 40 to 37.
% 13.95/14.13  
% 13.95/14.13  Resetting weight limit to 37 after 195 givens.
% 13.95/14.13  
% 16.51/16.71  
% 16.51/16.71  
% 16.51/16.71  Changing weight limit from 37 to 34.
% 16.51/16.71  
% 16.51/16.71  Resetting weight limit to 34 after 275 givens.
% 16.51/16.71  
% 18.72/18.96  
% 18.72/18.96  
% 18.72/18.96  Changing weight limit from 34 to 32.
% 18.72/18.96  
% 18.72/18.96  Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 18.72/18.96  
% 18.72/18.96  
% 18.72/18.96  Resetting weight limit to 32 after 315 givens.
% 18.72/18.96  
% 19.24/19.43  
% 19.24/19.43  
% 19.24/19.43  Changing weight limit from 32 to 31.
% 19.24/19.43  
% 19.24/19.43  Resetting weight limit to 31 after 325 givens.
% 19.24/19.43  
% 19.80/20.02  
% 19.80/20.02  
% 19.80/20.02  Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 19.80/20.02  
% 19.80/20.02  Resetting weight limit to 30 after 345 givens.
% 19.80/20.02  
% 34.12/34.36  
% 34.12/34.36  
% 34.12/34.36  Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 34.12/34.36  
% 34.12/34.36  Resetting weight limit to 29 after 635 givens.
% 34.12/34.36  
% 36.04/36.24  
% 36.04/36.24  
% 36.04/36.24  Changing weight limit from 29 to 28.
% 36.04/36.24  
% 36.04/36.24  Resetting weight limit to 28 after 655 givens.
% 36.04/36.24  
% 38.14/38.34  
% 38.14/38.34  
% 38.14/38.34  Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 38.14/38.34  
% 38.14/38.34  Resetting weight limit to 27 after 700 givens.
% 38.14/38.34  
% 40.23/40.42  
% 40.23/40.42  
% 40.23/40.42  Changing weight limit from 27 to 25.
% 40.23/40.42  
% 40.23/40.42  Resetting weight limit to 25 after 710 givens.
% 40.23/40.42  
% 58.51/58.70  
% 58.51/58.70  
% 58.51/58.70  Changing weight limit from 25 to 21.
% 58.51/58.70  
% 58.51/58.70  Resetting weight limit to 21 after 985 givens.
% 58.51/58.70  
% 68.82/69.09  
% 68.82/69.09  
% 68.82/69.09  Changing weight limit from 21 to 19.
% 68.82/69.09  
% 68.82/69.09  Resetting weight limit to 19 after 1255 givens.
% 68.82/69.09  
% 114.71/114.92  
% 114.71/114.92  
% 114.71/114.92  Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 114.71/114.92  
% 114.71/114.92  Resetting weight limit to 18 after 2460 givens.
% 114.71/114.92  
% 207.13/207.32  
% 207.13/207.32  
% 207.13/207.32  Changing weight limit from 18 to 16.
% 207.13/207.32  
% 207.13/207.32  Resetting weight limit to 16 after 4060 givens.
% 207.13/207.32  
% 300.02/300.22  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------