TSTP Solution File: ALG071+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : ALG071+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 17:59:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.74s 2.92s
% Output   : Refutation 2.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  17 unt;   0 nHn;  29 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   46 (  18 equ;  19 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ sorti1(X)
    | ~ sorti1(Y)
    | sorti1(op1(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1) ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ sorti2(X)
    | ~ sorti2(Y)
    | sorti2(op2(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2) ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ sorti1(X)
    | sorti1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3) ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ sorti1(X)
    | op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(X),op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(X),X)) != X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3) ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ sorti1(X)
    | op1(X,op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(X),X)) = 'SKOLEMAAAV1'(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3) ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    sorti2('SKOLEMAAAV2'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax4) ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ sorti2(X)
    | op2(X,op2(X,'SKOLEMAAAV2')) = 'SKOLEMAAAV2'
    | op2('SKOLEMAAAV2',op2(X,'SKOLEMAAAV2')) != X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax4) ).

cnf(8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ sorti1(X)
    | sorti2(h(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

cnf(9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ sorti2(X)
    | sorti1(j(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

cnf(10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ sorti1(X)
    | ~ sorti1(Y)
    | h(op1(X,Y)) = op2(h(X),h(Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

cnf(11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ sorti2(X)
    | ~ sorti2(Y)
    | j(op2(X,Y)) = op1(j(X),j(Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

cnf(12,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ sorti2(X)
    | h(j(X)) = X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

cnf(13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ sorti1(X)
    | j(h(X)) = X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

cnf(14,plain,
    sorti1(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[9,6]) ).

cnf(15,plain,
    h(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')) = 'SKOLEMAAAV2',
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,6]) ).

cnf(18,plain,
    sorti1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,14]) ).

cnf(23,plain,
    op1(j('SKOLEMAAAV2'),op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),j('SKOLEMAAAV2'))) = 'SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,14]) ).

cnf(24,plain,
    op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),j('SKOLEMAAAV2'))) != j('SKOLEMAAAV2'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[4,14]) ).

cnf(25,plain,
    sorti2(h('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[8,18]) ).

cnf(27,plain,
    sorti1(op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),j('SKOLEMAAAV2'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[1,18,14]) ).

cnf(30,plain,
    j(h('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')))) = 'SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[13,18]) ).

cnf(31,plain,
    h(op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),j('SKOLEMAAAV2'))) = op2(h('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2'))),'SKOLEMAAAV2'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[10,18,14]),15,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(55,plain,
    sorti2(h(op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),j('SKOLEMAAAV2')))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[2,25,6]),31,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(60,plain,
    j(h(op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),j('SKOLEMAAAV2')))) = op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,25,6]),30,31,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(94,plain,
    h('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2'))) = op2('SKOLEMAAAV2',h(op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),j('SKOLEMAAAV2')))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[10,27,14]),15,23,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(96,plain,
    h(op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),j('SKOLEMAAAV2')))) = op2(h('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2'))),h(op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),j('SKOLEMAAAV2')))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[10,27,18]) ).

cnf(488,plain,
    j(h(op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),j('SKOLEMAAAV2'))))) = op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),j('SKOLEMAAAV2'))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,55,25]),60,30,96,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(10566,plain,
    h(op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),op1('SKOLEMAAAV1'(j('SKOLEMAAAV2')),j('SKOLEMAAAV2')))) = 'SKOLEMAAAV2',
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[7,31,theory(equality)]),94,96,25,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(10568,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[488,24,10566,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : ALG071+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun  8 05:34:38 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.45   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.45   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.45   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.45   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  "."
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-08T05:34:38
% 0.18/0.45  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n023.cluster.edu at 2022-06-08T05:34:38
% 2.74/2.92  
% 2.74/2.92  
% 2.74/2.92  #||
% 2.74/2.92  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.74/2.92  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.74/2.92  ||#
% 2.74/2.92  
% 2.74/2.92  ; Summary of computation:
% 2.74/2.92  ;     21838 formulas have been input or derived (from 112 formulas).
% 2.74/2.92  ;     10568 (48%) were retained.  Of these,
% 2.74/2.92  ;          140 ( 1%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 2.74/2.92  ;        10428 (99%) are still being kept.
% 2.74/2.92  ; 
% 2.74/2.92  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 2.74/2.92  ;     0.003   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 2.74/2.92  ;     0.001   0%   Assert                       (5 calls)
% 2.74/2.92  ;     1.323  54%   Process new row              (21,540 calls)
% 2.74/2.92  ;     0.418  17%   Resolution                   (222 calls)
% 2.74/2.92  ;     0.006   0%   Paramodulation               (111 calls)
% 2.74/2.92  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (12 calls)
% 2.74/2.92  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (12 calls)
% 2.74/2.92  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (12 calls)
% 2.74/2.92  ;     0.506  21%   Forward simplification       (21,540 calls)
% 2.74/2.92  ;     0.083   3%   Backward simplification      (10,568 calls)
% 2.74/2.92  ;     0.048   2%   Ordering                     (5,301 calls)
% 2.74/2.92  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 2.74/2.92  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 2.74/2.92  ;     0.077   3%   Other
% 2.74/2.92  ;     2.465        Total
% 2.74/2.92  ;     2.468        Real time
% 2.74/2.92  ; 
% 2.74/2.92  ; Term-hash-array has 25,281 terms in all.
% 2.74/2.92  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 12 entries (12 at peak, 12 added, 0 deleted).
% 2.74/2.92  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 65 nodes (65 at peak, 65 added, 0 deleted).
% 2.74/2.92  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly forward subsuming rows in 12 calls.
% 2.74/2.92  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 12 calls.
% 2.74/2.92  ; Path-index has 24,870 entries (25,278 at peak, 25,283 added, 413 deleted).
% 2.74/2.92  ; Path-index has 4,239 nodes (4,239 at peak, 4,247 added, 8 deleted).
% 2.74/2.92  ; Trie-index has 24,870 entries (25,278 at peak, 25,283 added, 413 deleted).
% 2.74/2.92  ; Trie-index has 209,485 nodes (213,673 at peak, 213,699 added, 4,214 deleted).
% 2.74/2.92  ; Retrieved 15,427 generalization terms in 159,793 calls.
% 2.74/2.92  ; Retrieved 10,555 instance terms in 10,555 calls.
% 2.74/2.92  ; Retrieved 895,661 unifiable terms in 12,952 calls.
% 2.74/2.92  ; 
% 2.74/2.92  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 135 entries:
% 2.74/2.92  ;   135 with value 0
% 2.74/2.92  ; The agenda of rows to give has 10316 entries:
% 2.74/2.92  ;    50 with value (4 22)         20 with value (4 36)          70 with value (4 49)
% 2.74/2.92  ;    78 with value (4 23)         22 with value (4 37)         432 with value (4 50)
% 2.74/2.92  ;    93 with value (4 24)         65 with value (4 38)          61 with value (4 51)
% 2.74/2.92  ;   137 with value (4 25)         33 with value (4 39)         545 with value (4 52)
% 2.74/2.92  ;   205 with value (4 26)         82 with value (4 40)          22 with value (4 53)
% 2.74/2.92  ;   218 with value (4 27)         48 with value (4 41)         696 with value (4 54)
% 2.74/2.92  ;   295 with value (4 28)        102 with value (4 42)          12 with value (4 55)
% 2.74/2.92  ;   429 with value (4 29)         42 with value (4 43)         661 with value (4 56)
% 2.74/2.92  ;   543 with value (4 30)        142 with value (4 44)          10 with value (4 57)
% 2.74/2.92  ;   681 with value (4 31)         70 with value (4 45)         719 with value (4 58)
% 2.74/2.92  ;   741 with value (4 32)        217 with value (4 46)           1 with value (4 59)
% 2.74/2.92  ;   757 with value (4 33)         93 with value (4 47)         419 with value (4 60)
% 2.74/2.92  ;   681 with value (4 34)        280 with value (4 48)         192 with value (4 62)
% 2.74/2.92  ;   352 with value (4 35)
% 2.74/2.92  Evaluation took:
% 2.74/2.92    2.469 seconds of real time
% 2.74/2.92    2.287546 seconds of user run time
% 2.74/2.92    0.18117 seconds of system run time
% 2.74/2.92    [Run times include 0.427 seconds GC run time.]
% 2.74/2.92    0 calls to %EVAL
% 2.74/2.92    0 page faults and
% 2.74/2.92    185,157,792 bytes consed.
% 2.74/2.92  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.74/2.92  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-08T05:34:41
% 2.74/2.92  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.74/2.92  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------