TSTP Solution File: ALG070+1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : ALG070+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:46:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.68s 1.86s
% Output   : Refutation 1.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (  13 unt;   0 nHn;  18 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   27 (  13 equ;  10 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ sorti1(A)
    | ~ sorti1(B)
    | op1(A,A) != B
    | op1(A,B) = A ),
    file('ALG070+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    op2(dollar_c2,dollar_c1) != dollar_c2,
    file('ALG070+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ sorti2(A)
    | sorti1(j(A)) ),
    file('ALG070+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ sorti1(A)
    | ~ sorti1(B)
    | h(op1(A,B)) = op2(h(A),h(B)) ),
    file('ALG070+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( ~ sorti2(A)
    | ~ sorti2(B)
    | j(op2(A,B)) = op1(j(A),j(B)) ),
    file('ALG070+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ( ~ sorti2(A)
    | h(j(A)) = A ),
    file('ALG070+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    sorti2(dollar_c2),
    file('ALG070+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    sorti2(dollar_c1),
    file('ALG070+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    op2(dollar_c2,dollar_c2) = dollar_c1,
    file('ALG070+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    h(j(dollar_c2)) = dollar_c2,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[12,9]),
    [iquote('hyper,12,9')] ).

cnf(18,plain,
    op1(j(dollar_c2),j(dollar_c2)) = j(dollar_c1),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[12,8,12]),15])]),
    [iquote('hyper,12,8,12,demod,15,flip.1')] ).

cnf(20,plain,
    sorti1(j(dollar_c2)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[12,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,12,6')] ).

cnf(22,plain,
    h(j(dollar_c1)) = dollar_c1,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[13,9]),
    [iquote('hyper,13,9')] ).

cnf(29,plain,
    sorti1(j(dollar_c1)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[13,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,13,6')] ).

cnf(35,plain,
    h(op1(j(dollar_c2),j(dollar_c1))) = op2(dollar_c2,dollar_c1),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[29,7,20]),17,22]),
    [iquote('hyper,29,7,20,demod,17,22')] ).

cnf(106,plain,
    op1(j(dollar_c2),j(dollar_c1)) = j(dollar_c2),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[18,3,20,29]),
    [iquote('hyper,18,3,20,29')] ).

cnf(125,plain,
    op2(dollar_c2,dollar_c1) = dollar_c2,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[35]),106,17])]),
    [iquote('back_demod,35,demod,106,17,flip.1')] ).

cnf(127,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[125,4]),
    [iquote('binary,125.1,4.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : ALG070+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 03:31:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.68/1.86  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.68/1.86  The process was started by sandbox on n021.cluster.edu,
% 1.68/1.86  Wed Jul 27 03:31:08 2022
% 1.68/1.86  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 13002.
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.68/1.86  set(auto).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.68/1.86  clear(print_given).
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  formula_list(usable).
% 1.68/1.86  all A (A=A).
% 1.68/1.86  all U (sorti1(U)-> (all V (sorti1(V)->sorti1(op1(U,V))))).
% 1.68/1.86  all U (sorti2(U)-> (all V (sorti2(V)->sorti2(op2(U,V))))).
% 1.68/1.86  all U (sorti1(U)-> (all V (sorti1(V)->op1(U,U)!=V|op1(U,V)=U))).
% 1.68/1.86  -(all U (sorti2(U)-> (all V (sorti2(V)->op2(U,U)!=V|op2(U,V)=U)))).
% 1.68/1.86  -((all U (sorti1(U)->sorti2(h(U))))& (all V (sorti2(V)->sorti1(j(V))))-> -((all W (sorti1(W)-> (all X (sorti1(X)->h(op1(W,X))=op2(h(W),h(X))))))& (all Y (sorti2(Y)-> (all Z (sorti2(Z)->j(op2(Y,Z))=op1(j(Y),j(Z))))))& (all X1 (sorti2(X1)->h(j(X1))=X1))& (all X2 (sorti1(X2)->j(h(X2))=X2)))).
% 1.68/1.86  end_of_list.
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  list(usable).
% 1.68/1.86  0 [] A=A.
% 1.68/1.86  0 [] -sorti1(U)| -sorti1(V)|sorti1(op1(U,V)).
% 1.68/1.86  0 [] -sorti2(U)| -sorti2(V)|sorti2(op2(U,V)).
% 1.68/1.86  0 [] -sorti1(U)| -sorti1(V)|op1(U,U)!=V|op1(U,V)=U.
% 1.68/1.86  0 [] sorti2($c2).
% 1.68/1.86  0 [] sorti2($c1).
% 1.68/1.86  0 [] op2($c2,$c2)=$c1.
% 1.68/1.86  0 [] op2($c2,$c1)!=$c2.
% 1.68/1.86  0 [] -sorti1(U)|sorti2(h(U)).
% 1.68/1.86  0 [] -sorti2(V)|sorti1(j(V)).
% 1.68/1.86  0 [] -sorti1(W)| -sorti1(X)|h(op1(W,X))=op2(h(W),h(X)).
% 1.68/1.86  0 [] -sorti2(Y)| -sorti2(Z)|j(op2(Y,Z))=op1(j(Y),j(Z)).
% 1.68/1.86  0 [] -sorti2(X1)|h(j(X1))=X1.
% 1.68/1.86  0 [] -sorti1(X2)|j(h(X2))=X2.
% 1.68/1.86  end_of_list.
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.68/1.86  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 1.68/1.86  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.68/1.86     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  ------------> process usable:
% 1.68/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 1 [] -sorti1(A)| -sorti1(B)|sorti1(op1(A,B)).
% 1.68/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 2 [] -sorti2(A)| -sorti2(B)|sorti2(op2(A,B)).
% 1.68/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 3 [] -sorti1(A)| -sorti1(B)|op1(A,A)!=B|op1(A,B)=A.
% 1.68/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 4 [] op2($c2,$c1)!=$c2.
% 1.68/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 5 [] -sorti1(A)|sorti2(h(A)).
% 1.68/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 6 [] -sorti2(A)|sorti1(j(A)).
% 1.68/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 7 [] -sorti1(A)| -sorti1(B)|h(op1(A,B))=op2(h(A),h(B)).
% 1.68/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 8 [] -sorti2(A)| -sorti2(B)|j(op2(A,B))=op1(j(A),j(B)).
% 1.68/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 9 [] -sorti2(A)|h(j(A))=A.
% 1.68/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 10 [] -sorti1(A)|j(h(A))=A.
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  ------------> process sos:
% 1.68/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 11 [] A=A.
% 1.68/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 12 [] sorti2($c2).
% 1.68/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 13 [] sorti2($c1).
% 1.68/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 14 [] op2($c2,$c2)=$c1.
% 1.68/1.86  ---> New Demodulator: 15 [new_demod,14] op2($c2,$c2)=$c1.
% 1.68/1.86    Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [copy,11,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.68/1.86  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 15.
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 127 [binary,125.1,4.1] $F.
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  Length of proof is 8.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.68/1.86  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.68/1.86  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.68/1.86  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  ============ end of search ============
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.68/1.86  clauses given                 11
% 1.68/1.86  clauses generated             97
% 1.68/1.86  clauses kept                  84
% 1.68/1.86  clauses forward subsumed      39
% 1.68/1.86  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.68/1.86  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.68/1.86  
% 1.68/1.86  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.68/1.86  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.68/1.86  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.68/1.86  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.68/1.87  
% 1.68/1.87  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.68/1.87  
% 1.68/1.87  Process 13002 finished Wed Jul 27 03:31:09 2022
% 1.68/1.87  Otter interrupted
% 1.68/1.87  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------