TSTP Solution File: ALG069+1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : ALG069+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 18:00:33 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 77 ( 22 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 14 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 88 ( 30 ~; 21 |; 17 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 20 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 0 sgn 28 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
( ( ! [X1] :
( sorti1(X1)
=> sorti2(h(X1)) )
& ! [X2] :
( sorti2(X2)
=> sorti1(j(X2)) ) )
=> ~ ( ! [X3] :
( sorti1(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( sorti1(X4)
=> h(op1(X3,X4)) = op2(h(X3),h(X4)) ) )
& ! [X5] :
( sorti2(X5)
=> ! [X6] :
( sorti2(X6)
=> j(op2(X5,X6)) = op1(j(X5),j(X6)) ) )
& ! [X7] :
( sorti2(X7)
=> h(j(X7)) = X7 )
& ! [X8] :
( sorti1(X8)
=> j(h(X8)) = X8 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
fof(ax4,axiom,
~ ! [X1] :
( sorti2(X1)
=> ? [X2] :
( sorti2(X2)
& op2(X2,X2) = X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax4) ).
fof(ax3,axiom,
! [X1] :
( sorti1(X1)
=> ? [X2] :
( sorti1(X2)
& op1(X2,X2) = X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ! [X1] :
( sorti1(X1)
=> sorti2(h(X1)) )
& ! [X2] :
( sorti2(X2)
=> sorti1(j(X2)) ) )
=> ~ ( ! [X3] :
( sorti1(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( sorti1(X4)
=> h(op1(X3,X4)) = op2(h(X3),h(X4)) ) )
& ! [X5] :
( sorti2(X5)
=> ! [X6] :
( sorti2(X6)
=> j(op2(X5,X6)) = op1(j(X5),j(X6)) ) )
& ! [X7] :
( sorti2(X7)
=> h(j(X7)) = X7 )
& ! [X8] :
( sorti1(X8)
=> j(h(X8)) = X8 ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X24] :
( sorti2(esk2_0)
& ( ~ sorti2(X24)
| op2(X24,X24) != esk2_0 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X9,X10,X11,X12,X13,X14,X15,X16] :
( ( ~ sorti1(X9)
| sorti2(h(X9)) )
& ( ~ sorti2(X10)
| sorti1(j(X10)) )
& ( ~ sorti1(X11)
| ~ sorti1(X12)
| h(op1(X11,X12)) = op2(h(X11),h(X12)) )
& ( ~ sorti2(X13)
| ~ sorti2(X14)
| j(op2(X13,X14)) = op1(j(X13),j(X14)) )
& ( ~ sorti2(X15)
| h(j(X15)) = X15 )
& ( ~ sorti1(X16)
| j(h(X16)) = X16 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ sorti2(X1)
| op2(X1,X1) != esk2_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( h(op1(X1,X2)) = op2(h(X1),h(X2))
| ~ sorti1(X1)
| ~ sorti1(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( sorti2(h(X1))
| ~ sorti1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X19] :
( ( sorti1(esk1_1(X19))
| ~ sorti1(X19) )
& ( op1(esk1_1(X19),esk1_1(X19)) = X19
| ~ sorti1(X19) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( h(op1(X1,X1)) != esk2_0
| ~ sorti1(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( op1(esk1_1(X1),esk1_1(X1)) = X1
| ~ sorti1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( sorti1(esk1_1(X1))
| ~ sorti1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( h(X1) != esk2_0
| ~ sorti1(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( h(j(X1)) = X1
| ~ sorti2(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
sorti2(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ sorti1(j(esk2_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( sorti1(j(X1))
| ~ sorti2(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.09 % Problem : ALG069+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.08/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Sat May 18 23:18:22 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.42 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # new_bool_3 with pid 13729 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: FHHSF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 13733 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: FHHSF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.42 # Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses : 12
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 12
% 0.15/0.42 # Processed clauses : 26
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 26
% 0.15/0.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Generated clauses : 11
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.15/0.42 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # Paramodulations : 10
% 0.15/0.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of those cached : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 12
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.15/0.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 16
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 12
% 0.15/0.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5
% 0.15/0.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1240
% 0.15/0.42 # Search garbage collected termcells : 329
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.15/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.42 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------