TSTP Solution File: ALG036+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : ALG036+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 18:00:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.42s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : ALG036+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 04:28:32 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.19/0.42  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.42  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.42  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.42  The process was started by sandbox on n028.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.42  Thu Jun  9 04:28:32 2022
% 0.19/0.42  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 9122.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.42  set(auto).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.42  clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.42  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.42  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.42  clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 113 during input processing: 0 [] {-} op(e0,e0)=e0|op(e0,e0)=e1|op(e0,e0)=e2|op(e0,e0)=e3.
% 0.19/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 118 during input processing: 0 [] {-} op(e1,e1)=e0|op(e1,e1)=e1|op(e1,e1)=e2|op(e1,e1)=e3.
% 0.19/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 123 during input processing: 0 [] {-} op(e2,e2)=e0|op(e2,e2)=e1|op(e2,e2)=e2|op(e2,e2)=e3.
% 0.19/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 128 during input processing: 0 [] {-} op(e3,e3)=e0|op(e3,e3)=e1|op(e3,e3)=e2|op(e3,e3)=e3.
% 0.19/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 432 during input processing: 0 [copy,432,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.06 sec ----> 491 [back_demod,109,demod,446,490,488,486,unit_del,432,432,432,432] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  Length of proof is 13.  Level of proof is 4.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.19/0.42  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.42  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  61 [] {-} op(e1,e0)!=op(e1,e1).
% 0.19/0.42  62 [copy,61,flip.1] {-} op(e1,e1)!=op(e1,e0).
% 0.19/0.42  75 [] {-} op(e2,e0)!=op(e2,e2).
% 0.19/0.42  76 [copy,75,flip.1] {-} op(e2,e2)!=op(e2,e0).
% 0.19/0.42  97 [] {-} e0!=e1.
% 0.19/0.42  98 [copy,97,flip.1] {-} e1!=e0.
% 0.19/0.42  99 [] {-} e0!=e2.
% 0.19/0.42  100 [copy,99,flip.1] {-} e2!=e0.
% 0.19/0.42  101 [] {-} e0!=e3.
% 0.19/0.42  102 [copy,101,flip.1] {-} e3!=e0.
% 0.19/0.42  109 [] {-} op(e0,e0)!=e0|op(e1,e1)!=e0|op(e2,e2)!=e0|op(e3,e3)!=e0.
% 0.19/0.42  131 [] {-} op(e0,unit)=e0.
% 0.19/0.42  135 [] {-} op(e1,unit)=e1.
% 0.19/0.42  139 [] {-} op(e2,unit)=e2.
% 0.19/0.42  179,178 [] {-} unit=e0.
% 0.19/0.42  302 [] {-} op(e1,e1)=e0|op(e3,e3)=e1|op(e3,e3)=e2|op(e0,e0)=e3.
% 0.19/0.42  365 [] {-} op(e2,e2)=e0|op(e3,e3)=e1|op(e3,e3)=e2|op(e0,e0)=e3.
% 0.19/0.42  393 [] {-} op(e3,e3)=e0|op(e1,e1)=e1|op(e2,e2)=e2|op(e0,e0)=e3.
% 0.19/0.42  432 [] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.42  438,437 [back_demod,139,demod,179] {-} op(e2,e0)=e2.
% 0.19/0.42  442,441 [back_demod,135,demod,179] {-} op(e1,e0)=e1.
% 0.19/0.42  446,445 [back_demod,131,demod,179] {-} op(e0,e0)=e0.
% 0.19/0.42  462 [back_demod,76,demod,438] {-} op(e2,e2)!=e2.
% 0.19/0.42  474 [back_demod,62,demod,442] {-} op(e1,e1)!=e1.
% 0.19/0.42  486,485 [back_demod,393,demod,446,unit_del,474,462,102] {-} op(e3,e3)=e0.
% 0.19/0.42  488,487 [back_demod,365,demod,486,486,446,unit_del,98,100,102] {-} op(e2,e2)=e0.
% 0.19/0.42  490,489 [back_demod,302,demod,486,486,446,unit_del,98,100,102] {-} op(e1,e1)=e0.
% 0.19/0.42  491 [back_demod,109,demod,446,490,488,486,unit_del,432,432,432,432] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.42  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  ============ end of search ============
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  Process 9122 finished Thu Jun  9 04:28:32 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------