%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : ALG017+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 14:42:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.88s 2.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   7 unt;   2 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   11 (   6 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_183,negated_conjecture,
    ( op(e3,e3) = e3
    | epred1_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1zc70n1d/lgb.p',i_0_183) ).

cnf(i_0_180,plain,
    op(e3,e3) = e0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1zc70n1d/lgb.p',i_0_180) ).

cnf(i_0_176,plain,
    e3 != e0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1zc70n1d/lgb.p',i_0_176) ).

cnf(i_0_182,negated_conjecture,
    ~ epred1_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1zc70n1d/lgb.p',i_0_182) ).

cnf(c_0_188,negated_conjecture,
    ( op(e3,e3) = e3
    | epred1_0 ),
    i_0_183 ).

cnf(c_0_189,plain,
    op(e3,e3) = e0,
    i_0_180 ).

cnf(c_0_190,plain,
    e3 != e0,
    i_0_176 ).

cnf(c_0_191,negated_conjecture,
    ~ epred1_0,
    i_0_182 ).

cnf(c_0_192,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_188,c_0_189]),c_0_190]),c_0_191]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : ALG017+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun  8 23:11:35 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.88/2.39  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.88/2.39  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.88/2.39  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.88/2.39  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S068N
% 7.88/2.39  # and selection function PSelectNewComplexAHP.
% 7.88/2.39  #
% 7.88/2.39  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 7.88/2.39  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.88/2.39  
% 7.88/2.39  # Proof found!
% 7.88/2.39  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.88/2.39  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.88/2.39  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.88/2.39  
% 7.88/2.39  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.88/2.39  # User time                : 0.023 s
% 7.88/2.39  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 7.88/2.39  # Total time               : 0.029 s
% 7.88/2.39  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.88/2.39  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------