TSTP Solution File: AGT037^1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : AGT037^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 17:58:49 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.45s
% Output   : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.09  % Problem    : AGT037^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.03/0.10  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.09/0.29  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % DateTime   : Sat May 18 18:51:08 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.09/0.30  This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.09/0.30  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.32  % (2576)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.14/0.32  % (2577)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.14/0.32  % (2575)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.32  % (2578)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.32  % (2572)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.14/0.32  % (2571)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.14/0.32  % (2574)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.32  % (2573)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.14/0.32  % (2574)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.32  % (2574)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.32  % (2574)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.32  % (2574)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.32  % (2574)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.32  
% 0.14/0.32  % (2575)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.32  % (2575)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.32  % (2575)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.32  % (2575)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.32  % (2575)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.32  
% 0.14/0.32  % (2575)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.14/0.32  % (2575)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.32  % (2575)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.14/0.32  % (2575)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.32  % (2575)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.32  % (2574)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.14/0.32  % (2574)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.32  % (2574)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.32  % (2574)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.32  % (2574)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.32  % (2578)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.32  % (2578)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.32  % (2578)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.32  % (2578)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.32  % (2578)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.32  
% 0.14/0.32  % (2578)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.14/0.32  % (2578)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.32  % (2578)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.14/0.32  % (2578)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.32  % (2578)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.32  % (2572)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.32  % (2572)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.32  % (2572)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.32  % (2572)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.32  % (2572)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.32  
% 0.14/0.32  % (2572)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.14/0.32  % (2572)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.32  % (2572)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.14/0.32  % (2572)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.32  % (2572)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.33  % (2576)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.33  % (2576)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.33  % (2576)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.33  % (2576)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  % (2576)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.14/0.33  % (2576)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.33  % (2576)Instructions burned: 15 (million)
% 0.14/0.33  % (2576)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.33  % (2576)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.33  % (2577)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.33  % (2577)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.33  % (2577)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.33  % (2577)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.33  % (2577)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  % (2577)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.14/0.33  % (2577)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
% 0.14/0.33  % (2577)Instructions burned: 19 (million)
% 0.14/0.33  % (2577)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.33  % (2577)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.33  % (2573)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.33  % (2573)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.33  % (2573)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.33  % (2573)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.33  % (2573)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  % (2573)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.14/0.33  % (2573)Time elapsed: 0.015 s
% 0.14/0.33  % (2573)Instructions burned: 28 (million)
% 0.14/0.33  % (2573)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.33  % (2573)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.33  % (2579)lrs+1002_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:hud=14:prag=on:sp=weighted_frequency:tnu=1:i=37:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.14/0.33  % (2580)lrs+2_16:1_acc=model:au=on:bd=off:c=on:e2e=on:nm=2:sos=all:i=15:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/15Mi)
% 0.14/0.33  % (2581)dis+21_1:1_cbe=off:cnfonf=off:fs=off:fsr=off:hud=1:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.33  % (2582)lrs+1002_1:1_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_gen:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=4203469,65536:i=1041:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/1041Mi)
% 0.14/0.34  % (2581)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.34  % (2581)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.34  % (2581)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.34  % (2581)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.34  % (2581)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.34  
% 0.14/0.34  % (2581)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.14/0.34  % (2581)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.34  % (2581)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.14/0.34  % (2581)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.34  % (2581)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.34  % (2580)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.34  % (2580)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.34  % (2580)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.34  % (2580)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.34  % (2580)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.14/0.34  
% 0.14/0.34  % (2580)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.14/0.34  % (2580)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.14/0.34  % (2580)Instructions burned: 15 (million)
% 0.14/0.34  % (2580)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.34  % (2580)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.34  % (2583)lrs+10_1:1_av=off:chr=on:plsq=on:slsq=on:i=7:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.14/0.34  % (2584)lrs+10_1:1_acc=on:amm=sco:cs=on:tgt=full:i=16:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/16Mi)
% 0.14/0.34  % (2583)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.34  % (2583)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.34  % (2583)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.34  % (2583)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.34  % (2583)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.14/0.34  
% 0.14/0.34  % (2583)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.14/0.34  % (2583)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.34  % (2583)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.14/0.34  % (2583)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.34  % (2583)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.35  % (2584)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.35  % (2584)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.35  % (2584)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.35  % (2584)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.35  % (2584)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.14/0.35  
% 0.14/0.35  % (2584)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.14/0.35  % (2584)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.35  % (2584)Instructions burned: 17 (million)
% 0.14/0.35  % (2585)lrs+21_1:1_au=on:cnfonf=off:fd=preordered:fe=off:fsr=off:hud=11:inj=on:kws=precedence:s2pl=no:sp=weighted_frequency:tgt=full:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.35  % (2584)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.35  % (2584)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.35  % (2586)lrs+2_1:1_apa=on:au=on:bd=preordered:cnfonf=off:cs=on:ixr=off:sos=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.35  % (2585)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.35  % (2585)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.35  % (2585)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.35  % (2585)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.35  % (2585)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.35  
% 0.14/0.35  % (2585)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.14/0.35  % (2585)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.35  % (2585)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.14/0.35  % (2585)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.35  % (2585)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.35  % (2586)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.35  % (2586)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.35  % (2586)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.35  % (2586)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.35  % (2586)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.35  
% 0.14/0.35  % (2586)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.14/0.35  % (2586)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.35  % (2586)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.14/0.35  % (2579)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.35  % (2579)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.35  % (2579)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.35  % (2579)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.35  % (2579)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.35  
% 0.14/0.35  % (2579)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.14/0.35  % (2579)Time elapsed: 0.019 s
% 0.14/0.35  % (2579)Instructions burned: 38 (million)
% 0.14/0.35  % (2579)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.35  % (2579)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.35  % (2586)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.35  % (2586)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.35  % (2587)lrs+10_1:1_cnfonf=off:cs=on:hud=3:prag=on:sup=off:i=7:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.14/0.36  % (2587)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.36  % (2587)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.36  % (2587)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.36  % (2587)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.36  % (2587)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  % (2587)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.14/0.36  % (2587)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.36  % (2587)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.14/0.36  % (2587)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.36  % (2587)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.36  % (2588)dis+1002_1:1_add=large:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:fe=off:prag=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.36  % (2588)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.36  % (2588)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.36  % (2588)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.36  % (2588)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.36  % (2588)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  % (2588)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.14/0.36  % (2588)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.36  % (2588)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.14/0.36  % (2588)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.36  % (2588)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.36  % (2589)dis+1004_1:1_cha=on:cs=on:fe=off:hud=1:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (2589)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.37  % (2589)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (2589)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.37  % (2592)lrs+1004_1:1_chr=on:prag=on:i=6:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (2591)lrs+10_1:1_e2e=on:sd=1:sgt=8:ss=axioms:i=710:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/710Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (2589)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.37  % (2589)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % (2589)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.14/0.37  % (2589)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.37  % (2589)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.14/0.37  % (2589)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (2589)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (2590)lrs+1002_1:1_anc=all_dependent:au=on:cbe=off:fde=unused:ntd=on:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (2592)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.37  % (2592)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (2592)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.37  % (2592)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.37  % (2592)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % (2592)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.14/0.37  % (2592)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.37  % (2592)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.14/0.37  % (2592)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (2592)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (2593)dis+1002_5:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:fde=none:fs=off:fsr=off:sos=on:i=902:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/902Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (2594)dis+21_1:8_apa=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:fsr=off:hud=0:ins=1:kws=inv_frequency:nwc=10.0:ss=axioms:st=5.0:i=21:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/21Mi)
% 0.14/0.38  % (2590)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.38  % (2590)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (2590)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38  % (2590)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.38  % (2590)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  % (2590)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.14/0.38  % (2590)Time elapsed: 0.011 s
% 0.14/0.38  % (2590)Instructions burned: 18 (million)
% 0.14/0.38  % (2590)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (2590)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (2595)dis+10_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:i=5:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/5Mi)
% 0.14/0.38  % (2593)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38  % (2593)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (2593)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38  % (2593)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  % (2593)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.14/0.38  % (2593)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.38  % (2593)Instructions burned: 15 (million)
% 0.14/0.38  % (2593)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (2593)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (2595)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.38  % (2595)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (2595)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38  % (2595)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.38  % (2595)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  % (2595)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.14/0.38  % (2595)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.38  % (2595)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.14/0.38  % (2595)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (2595)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (2596)lrs+2_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:cs=on:fe=off:hud=10:inj=on:ins=3:plsq=on:plsqc=1:sd=10:ss=axioms:tnu=1:i=6:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.14/0.38  % (2594)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.38  % (2594)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (2594)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38  % (2594)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.38  % (2594)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  % (2594)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.14/0.38  % (2594)Time elapsed: 0.011 s
% 0.14/0.38  % (2594)Instructions burned: 21 (million)
% 0.14/0.38  % (2594)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (2594)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (2596)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.39  % (2596)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (2596)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.39  % (2596)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.39  % (2596)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % (2596)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.14/0.39  % (2596)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.39  % (2596)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.14/0.39  % (2596)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (2596)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (2591)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.39  % (2591)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (2591)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.39  % (2591)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % (2591)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.14/0.39  % (2591)Time elapsed: 0.025 s
% 0.14/0.39  % (2591)Instructions burned: 44 (million)
% 0.14/0.39  % (2591)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (2591)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.39  % (2597)lrs+1002_1:128_au=on:c=on:fsr=off:piset=equals:i=377:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/377Mi)
% 0.14/0.40  % (2598)dis+1010_1:4_atotf=0.2:c=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_simp:fe=off:ins=2:ntd=on:s2a=on:s2at=5.0:sgt=5:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=779:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/779Mi)
% 0.14/0.40  % (2600)lrs+10_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:ntd=on:sp=const_min:ss=axioms:sup=off:i=19:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/19Mi)
% 0.14/0.40  % (2601)lrs+1010_1:1_au=on:s2a=on:sd=1:sgt=50:ss=axioms:i=879:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/879Mi)
% 0.14/0.40  % (2602)dis+1002_1:128_acc=on:er=filter:i=17:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/17Mi)
% 0.14/0.40  % (2600)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.40  % (2600)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40  % (2600)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.40  % (2600)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.40  % (2600)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  % (2600)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.14/0.40  % (2600)Time elapsed: 0.011 s
% 0.14/0.40  % (2600)Instructions burned: 19 (million)
% 0.14/0.40  % (2600)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40  % (2600)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41  % (2603)ott+21_1:1_apa=on:au=on:cnfonf=off:sos=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.41  % (2603)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.41  % (2603)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41  % (2603)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.41  % (2603)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.41  % (2603)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % (2603)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.14/0.41  % (2603)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.41  % (2603)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.14/0.41  % (2603)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41  % (2603)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41  % (2602)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.41  % (2602)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41  % (2602)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.41  % (2602)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.41  % (2602)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % (2602)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.14/0.41  % (2602)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
% 0.14/0.41  % (2602)Instructions burned: 19 (million)
% 0.14/0.41  % (2602)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41  % (2602)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41  % (2571)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.41  % (2571)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41  % (2571)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.41  % (2571)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.41  % (2571)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % (2571)Memory used [KB]: 6780
% 0.14/0.41  % (2571)Time elapsed: 0.094 s
% 0.14/0.41  % (2571)Instructions burned: 183 (million)
% 0.14/0.41  % (2571)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41  % (2571)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.42  % (2601)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.42  % (2601)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.42  % (2601)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.42  % (2601)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.42  
% 0.14/0.42  
% 0.14/0.42  % (2601)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.14/0.42  % (2601)Time elapsed: 0.019 s
% 0.14/0.42  % (2601)Instructions burned: 36 (million)
% 0.14/0.42  % (2601)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.42  % (2601)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.42  % (2604)lrs+1010_1:8_cnfonf=off:hud=1:inj=on:tnu=5:i=30:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/30Mi)
% 0.14/0.42  % (2605)dis+10_1:1_ixr=off:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:s2a=on:i=127:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/127Mi)
% 0.14/0.42  % (2606)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=conj_eager:cond=on:hi=on:i=100:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/100Mi)
% 0.14/0.43  % (2607)dis+10_1:1_anc=none:cnfonf=lazy_gen:fd=preordered:fe=off:hud=10:ins=3:ixr=off:nwc=5.0:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:sp=const_frequency:uhcvi=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.43  % (2607)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.43  % (2607)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43  % (2607)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.43  % (2607)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.43  % (2607)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.43  
% 0.14/0.43  % (2607)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.14/0.43  % (2607)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.43  % (2607)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.14/0.43  % (2607)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43  % (2607)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43  % (2608)lrs+10_8:1_au=on:avsq=on:e2e=on:ins=3:s2a=on:s2at=3.0:ss=axioms:i=20:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/20Mi)
% 0.14/0.43  % (2604)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.43  % (2604)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43  % (2604)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.43  % (2604)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.43  % (2604)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.43  
% 0.14/0.43  % (2604)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.14/0.43  % (2604)Time elapsed: 0.015 s
% 0.14/0.43  % (2604)Instructions burned: 31 (million)
% 0.14/0.43  % (2604)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43  % (2604)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44  % (2609)dis+1002_1:1_cbe=off:hud=5:nm=4:plsq=on:plsqr=7,1:prag=on:sp=const_max:tnu=1:i=86:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/86Mi)
% 0.14/0.44  % (2598)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.44  % (2608)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.44  % (2608)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44  % (2608)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.44  % (2608)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.44  % (2608)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % (2608)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.14/0.44  % (2608)Time elapsed: 0.012 s
% 0.14/0.44  % (2608)Instructions burned: 21 (million)
% 0.14/0.44  % (2608)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44  % (2608)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45  % (2598)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.45  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.45  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.45  thf(type_def_5, type, mu: $tType).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_0, type, mu: $tType).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_1, type, meq_ind: mu > mu > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_2, type, meq_prop: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_4, type, mnot: ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_5, type, mor: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_6, type, mand: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_7, type, mimplies: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_8, type, mimplied: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_9, type, mequiv: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_10, type, mxor: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_11, type, mforall_ind: (mu > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_12, type, mforall_prop: (($i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_13, type, mexists_ind: (mu > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_14, type, mexists_prop: (($i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_15, type, mtrue: $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_16, type, mfalse: $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_17, type, mbox: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_18, type, mdia: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_19, type, mreflexive: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_20, type, msymmetric: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_21, type, mserial: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_22, type, mtransitive: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_23, type, meuclidean: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_24, type, mpartially_functional: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_25, type, mfunctional: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_26, type, mweakly_dense: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_27, type, mweakly_connected: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_28, type, mweakly_directed: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_29, type, mvalid: ($i > $o) > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_30, type, minvalid: ($i > $o) > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_31, type, msatisfiable: ($i > $o) > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_32, type, mcountersatisfiable: ($i > $o) > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_33, type, a1: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_34, type, a2: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_35, type, a3: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_36, type, jan: mu).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_37, type, piotr: mu).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_38, type, cola: mu).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_39, type, pepsi: mu).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_40, type, beer: mu).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_41, type, likes: mu > mu > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_42, type, very_much_likes: mu > mu > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_43, type, possibly_likes: mu > mu > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_44, type, subrel: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_45, type, cond4s: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_62, type, sK1: $i > $i).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_63, type, sK2: mu > $i > mu > $i).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_64, type, sK3: mu > $i > mu > $i).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_65, type, sK4: $i > $i).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_66, type, sK5: $i > $i).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_68, type, sK7: $i > $i).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_69, type, sK8: mu > $i > mu > $i).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(func_def_70, type, sK9: $i > $i).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f799,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    $false),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f796])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f796,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ($false = $true)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(superposition,[],[f534,f767])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f767,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($false = (a3 @ sK6 @ X0))) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f764])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f764,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($false != $false) | ($false = (a3 @ sK6 @ X0))) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(equality_factoring,[],[f755])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f755,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($false = (a3 @ sK6 @ X0)) | ((a3 @ X1 @ X0) = $false)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f754])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f754,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (($false = (a3 @ sK6 @ X0)) | ((a3 @ X1 @ X0) = $false) | ($false = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(superposition,[],[f477,f580])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f580,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((possibly_likes @ jan @ cola @ X2) = $true) | ((a3 @ X2 @ X0) = $false) | ((a3 @ X1 @ X0) = $false)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f569])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f569,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((a3 @ X2 @ X0) = $false) | ($false = $true) | ((possibly_likes @ jan @ cola @ X2) = $true) | ((a3 @ X1 @ X0) = $false)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(superposition,[],[f383,f338])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f338,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X2 : mu,X3 : mu,X1 : $i,X4 : $i] : (($false = (likes @ X2 @ X3 @ X4)) | ($false = (a3 @ X1 @ X4)) | ((possibly_likes @ X2 @ X3 @ X1) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f337])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f337,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X2 : mu,X3 : mu,X1 : $i,X4 : $i] : (($false = (a3 @ X1 @ X4)) | ((~ (likes @ X2 @ X3 @ X4)) = $true) | ((possibly_likes @ X2 @ X3 @ X1) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f336])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f336,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X2 : mu,X3 : mu,X1 : $i,X4 : $i] : (((possibly_likes @ X2 @ X3 @ X1) = $true) | ((~ (a3 @ X1 @ X4)) = $true) | ((~ (likes @ X2 @ X3 @ X4)) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f335])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f335,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X2 : mu,X3 : mu,X1 : $i,X4 : $i] : ((((~ (likes @ X2 @ X3 @ X4)) | (~ (a3 @ X1 @ X4))) = $true) | ((possibly_likes @ X2 @ X3 @ X1) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f334])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f334,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X2 : mu,X3 : mu,X1 : $i,X4 : $i] : ((((^[Y0 : $i]: ((~ (likes @ X2 @ X3 @ Y0)) | (~ (a3 @ X1 @ Y0)))) @ X4) = $true) | ((possibly_likes @ X2 @ X3 @ X1) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f333])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f333,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X2 : mu,X3 : mu,X1 : $i] : (((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((~ (likes @ X2 @ X3 @ Y0)) | (~ (a3 @ X1 @ Y0))))) = $true) | ((possibly_likes @ X2 @ X3 @ X1) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f332])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f332,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X2 : mu,X3 : mu,X1 : $i] : ((((possibly_likes @ X2 @ X3 @ X1) | (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((~ (likes @ X2 @ X3 @ Y0)) | (~ (a3 @ X1 @ Y0)))))) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f331])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f331,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X2 : mu,X3 : mu,X1 : $i] : ((((^[Y0 : mu]: ((possibly_likes @ X2 @ Y0 @ X1) | (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((~ (likes @ X2 @ Y0 @ Y1)) | (~ (a3 @ X1 @ Y1))))))) @ X3) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f330])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f330,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X2 : mu,X1 : $i] : (((!! @ mu @ (^[Y0 : mu]: ((possibly_likes @ X2 @ Y0 @ X1) | (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((~ (likes @ X2 @ Y0 @ Y1)) | (~ (a3 @ X1 @ Y1)))))))) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f329])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f329,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X2 : mu,X1 : $i] : ((((^[Y0 : mu]: (!! @ mu @ (^[Y1 : mu]: ((possibly_likes @ Y0 @ Y1 @ X1) | (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((~ (likes @ Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2)) | (~ (a3 @ X1 @ Y2))))))))) @ X2) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f328])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f328,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((!! @ mu @ (^[Y0 : mu]: (!! @ mu @ (^[Y1 : mu]: ((possibly_likes @ Y0 @ Y1 @ X1) | (!! @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: ((~ (likes @ Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2)) | (~ (a3 @ X1 @ Y2)))))))))) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f327])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f327,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X1 : $i] : ((((^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ mu @ (^[Y1 : mu]: (!! @ mu @ (^[Y2 : mu]: ((possibly_likes @ Y1 @ Y2 @ Y0) | (!! @ $i @ (^[Y3 : $i]: ((~ (likes @ Y1 @ Y2 @ Y3)) | (~ (a3 @ Y0 @ Y3))))))))))) @ X1) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f326])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f326,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ mu @ (^[Y1 : mu]: (!! @ mu @ (^[Y2 : mu]: ((possibly_likes @ Y1 @ Y2 @ Y0) | (!! @ $i @ (^[Y3 : $i]: ((~ (likes @ Y1 @ Y2 @ Y3)) | (~ (a3 @ Y0 @ Y3)))))))))))) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f325])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f325,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ mu @ (^[Y1 : mu]: (!! @ mu @ (^[Y2 : mu]: ((possibly_likes @ Y1 @ Y2 @ Y0) | (~ (~ (!! @ $i @ (^[Y3 : $i]: ((~ (likes @ Y1 @ Y2 @ Y3)) | (~ (a3 @ Y0 @ Y3)))))))))))))) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f292])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f292,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (Y0 @ Y1)))) @ ((^[Y0 : mu > $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (!! @ mu @ (^[Y2 : mu]: (Y0 @ Y2 @ Y1)))))) @ (^[Y0 : mu]: ((^[Y1 : mu > $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: (!! @ mu @ (^[Y3 : mu]: (Y1 @ Y3 @ Y2)))))) @ (^[Y1 : mu]: ((^[Y2 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y3 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y4 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y5 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y6 : $i]: ((Y5 @ Y6) | (Y4 @ Y6))))))) @ ((^[Y4 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y5 : $i]: (~ (Y4 @ Y5))))) @ Y2) @ Y3)))) @ ((^[Y2 : $i > $i > $o]: ((^[Y3 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y4 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y5 : $i]: (~ (Y4 @ Y5))))) @ ((^[Y4 : $i > $i > $o]: ((^[Y5 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y6 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y7 : $i]: ((Y5 @ Y7) | (~ (Y4 @ Y6 @ Y7)))))))))) @ Y2 @ ((^[Y4 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y5 : $i]: (~ (Y4 @ Y5))))) @ Y3)))))) @ a3 @ (likes @ Y0 @ Y1)) @ (possibly_likes @ Y0 @ Y1))))))) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f262,f263,f246,f246,f270,f274])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f274,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mdia = (^[Y0 : $i > $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y3 : $i]: (~ (Y2 @ Y3))))) @ ((^[Y2 : $i > $i > $o]: ((^[Y3 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y4 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y5 : $i]: ((Y3 @ Y5) | (~ (Y2 @ Y4 @ Y5)))))))))) @ Y0 @ ((^[Y2 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y3 : $i]: (~ (Y2 @ Y3))))) @ Y1)))))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f247,f267,f227,f267])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f227,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mbox = (^[Y0 : $i > $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y3 : $i]: ((Y1 @ Y3) | (~ (Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3)))))))))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f81])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f81,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mbox = (^[Y0 : $i > $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y3 : $i]: ((Y1 @ Y3) | (~ (Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3)))))))))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f80])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f80,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mbox = (^[X0 : $i > $i > $o, X1 : $i > $o, X2 : $i] : (! [X3] : (~(X0 @ X2 @ X3) | (X1 @ X3)))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(rectify,[],[f16])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f16,axiom,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mbox = (^[X6 : $i > $i > $o, X3 : $i > $o, X2 : $i] : (! [X7] : (~(X6 @ X2 @ X7) | (X3 @ X7)))))),
% 0.14/0.45    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mbox)).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f267,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mnot = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (~ (Y0 @ Y1))))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f218])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f218,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mnot = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (~ (Y0 @ Y1))))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f217])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f217,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mnot = (^[X0 : $i > $o, X1 : $i] : (~(X0 @ X1))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(rectify,[],[f3])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f3,axiom,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mnot = (^[X3 : $i > $o, X2 : $i] : (~(X3 @ X2))))),
% 0.14/0.45    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mnot)).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f247,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mdia = (^[Y0 : $i > $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (mnot @ (mbox @ Y0 @ (mnot @ Y1)))))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f153])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f153,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mdia = (^[Y0 : $i > $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (mnot @ (mbox @ Y0 @ (mnot @ Y1)))))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f152])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f152,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mdia = (^[X0 : $i > $i > $o, X1 : $i > $o] : (mnot @ (mbox @ X0 @ (mnot @ X1)))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(rectify,[],[f17])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f17,axiom,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mdia = (^[X6 : $i > $i > $o, X3 : $i > $o] : (mnot @ (mbox @ X6 @ (mnot @ X3)))))),
% 0.14/0.45    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mdia)).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f270,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mimplies = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y3 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y4 : $i]: ((Y3 @ Y4) | (Y2 @ Y4))))))) @ ((^[Y2 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y3 : $i]: (~ (Y2 @ Y3))))) @ Y0) @ Y1)))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f249,f219,f267])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f219,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mor = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y1 @ Y2) | (Y0 @ Y2))))))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f159])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f159,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mor = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y1 @ Y2) | (Y0 @ Y2))))))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f158])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f158,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ((^[X0 : $i > $o, X1 : $i > $o, X2 : $i] : ((X0 @ X2) | (X1 @ X2))) = mor)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(rectify,[],[f4])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f4,axiom,(
% 0.14/0.45    ((^[X3 : $i > $o, X4 : $i > $o, X2 : $i] : ((X3 @ X2) | (X4 @ X2))) = mor)),
% 0.14/0.45    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mor)).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f249,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mimplies = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (mor @ (mnot @ Y0) @ Y1)))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f85])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f85,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mimplies = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (mor @ (mnot @ Y0) @ Y1)))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f84])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f84,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mimplies = (^[X0 : $i > $o, X1 : $i > $o] : (mor @ (mnot @ X0) @ X1)))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(rectify,[],[f6])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f6,axiom,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mimplies = (^[X3 : $i > $o, X4 : $i > $o] : (mor @ (mnot @ X3) @ X4)))),
% 0.14/0.45    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mimplies)).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f246,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mforall_ind = (^[Y0 : mu > $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (!! @ mu @ (^[Y2 : mu]: (Y0 @ Y2 @ Y1)))))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f83])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f83,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mforall_ind = (^[Y0 : mu > $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: (!! @ mu @ (^[Y2 : mu]: (Y0 @ Y2 @ Y1)))))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f82])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f82,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mforall_ind = (^[X0 : mu > $i > $o, X1 : $i] : (! [X2 : mu] : (X0 @ X2 @ X1))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(rectify,[],[f10])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f10,axiom,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mforall_ind = (^[X3 : mu > $i > $o, X2 : $i] : (! [X0 : mu] : (X3 @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 0.14/0.45    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mforall_ind)).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f263,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mvalid = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (Y0 @ Y1)))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f99])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f99,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mvalid = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (Y0 @ Y1)))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f98])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f98,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mvalid = (^[X0 : $i > $o] : (! [X1] : (X0 @ X1))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(rectify,[],[f28])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f28,axiom,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mvalid = (^[X3 : $i > $o] : (! [X2] : (X3 @ X2))))),
% 0.14/0.45    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mvalid)).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f262,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ((mvalid @ (mforall_ind @ (^[Y0 : mu]: (mforall_ind @ (^[Y1 : mu]: (mimplies @ (mdia @ a3 @ (likes @ Y0 @ Y1)) @ (possibly_likes @ Y0 @ Y1))))))) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f178])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f178,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ((mvalid @ (mforall_ind @ (^[Y0 : mu]: (mforall_ind @ (^[Y1 : mu]: (mimplies @ (mdia @ a3 @ (likes @ Y0 @ Y1)) @ (possibly_likes @ Y0 @ Y1))))))) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f177])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f177,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mvalid @ (mforall_ind @ (^[X0 : mu] : (mforall_ind @ (^[X1 : mu] : (mimplies @ (mdia @ a3 @ (likes @ X0 @ X1)) @ (possibly_likes @ X0 @ X1)))))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(rectify,[],[f49])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f49,axiom,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mvalid @ (mforall_ind @ (^[X0 : mu] : (mforall_ind @ (^[X1 : mu] : (mimplies @ (mdia @ a3 @ (likes @ X0 @ X1)) @ (possibly_likes @ X0 @ X1)))))))),
% 0.14/0.45    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_user_communication_5)).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f383,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((likes @ jan @ cola @ X2) = $true) | ($false = (a3 @ X1 @ X2))) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f382])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f382,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((likes @ jan @ cola @ X2) = $true) | ((~ (a3 @ X1 @ X2)) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f381])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f381,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((((likes @ jan @ cola @ X2) | (~ (a3 @ X1 @ X2))) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f380])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f380,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X2 : $i,X1 : $i] : ((((^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes @ jan @ cola @ Y0) | (~ (a3 @ X1 @ Y0)))) @ X2) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f379])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f379,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes @ jan @ cola @ Y0) | (~ (a3 @ X1 @ Y0))))) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f378])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f378,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X1 : $i] : ((((^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((likes @ jan @ cola @ Y1) | (~ (a3 @ Y0 @ Y1)))))) @ X1) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f318])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f318,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: ((likes @ jan @ cola @ Y1) | (~ (a3 @ Y0 @ Y1))))))) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f277])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f277,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (Y0 @ Y1)))) @ ((^[Y0 : $i > $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y3 : $i]: ((Y1 @ Y3) | (~ (Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3)))))))))) @ a3 @ (likes @ jan @ cola))) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f223,f263,f227])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f223,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ((mvalid @ (mbox @ a3 @ (likes @ jan @ cola))) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f164])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f164,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ((mvalid @ (mbox @ a3 @ (likes @ jan @ cola))) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f163])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f163,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mvalid @ (mbox @ a3 @ (likes @ jan @ cola)))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(rectify,[],[f41])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f41,axiom,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mvalid @ (mbox @ a3 @ (likes @ jan @ cola)))),
% 0.14/0.45    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_a3_1)).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f477,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ((possibly_likes @ jan @ cola @ sK6) = $false)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(sigma_clausification,[],[f476])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f476,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ((!! @ $i @ (possibly_likes @ jan @ cola)) = $false)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f306])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f306,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ((~ (!! @ $i @ (possibly_likes @ jan @ cola))) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f294])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f294,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ((~ ((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (Y0 @ Y1)))) @ (possibly_likes @ jan @ cola))) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f265,f263])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f265,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ((~ (mvalid @ (possibly_likes @ jan @ cola))) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f137])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f137,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ((~ (mvalid @ (possibly_likes @ jan @ cola))) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f136])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f136,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ~(mvalid @ (possibly_likes @ jan @ cola))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(rectify,[],[f74])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f74,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.45    ~(mvalid @ (possibly_likes @ jan @ cola))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f73])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f73,conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mvalid @ (possibly_likes @ jan @ cola))),
% 0.14/0.45    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj)).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f534,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((a3 @ X1 @ (sK9 @ X1)) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(sigma_clausification,[],[f533])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f533,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((?? @ $i @ (a3 @ X1)) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f532])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f532,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ( ! [X1 : $i] : ((((^[Y0 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (a3 @ Y0))) @ X1) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f297])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f297,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (a3 @ Y0)))) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f282])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f282,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (((^[Y0 : $i > $i > $o]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: (Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2)))))) @ a3) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f234,f250])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f250,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mserial = (^[Y0 : $i > $i > $o]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: (Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2)))))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f105])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f105,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mserial = (^[Y0 : $i > $i > $o]: (!! @ $i @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (?? @ $i @ (^[Y2 : $i]: (Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2)))))))),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f104])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f104,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ((^[X0 : $i > $i > $o] : (! [X1] : ? [X2] : (X0 @ X1 @ X2))) = mserial)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(rectify,[],[f20])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f20,axiom,(
% 0.14/0.45    ((^[X6 : $i > $i > $o] : (! [X8] : ? [X9] : (X6 @ X8 @ X9))) = mserial)),
% 0.14/0.45    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mserial)).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f234,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ((mserial @ a3) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f180])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f180,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    ((mserial @ a3) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f179])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f179,plain,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mserial @ a3)),
% 0.14/0.45    inference(rectify,[],[f55])).
% 0.14/0.45  thf(f55,axiom,(
% 0.14/0.45    (mserial @ a3)),
% 0.14/0.45    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axioms_D_a3)).
% 0.14/0.45  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.45  % (2598)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45  % (2598)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.45  % (2598)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.45  
% 0.14/0.45  % (2598)Memory used [KB]: 6140
% 0.14/0.45  % (2598)Time elapsed: 0.050 s
% 0.14/0.45  % (2598)Instructions burned: 92 (million)
% 0.14/0.45  % (2598)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45  % (2598)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45  % (2570)Success in time 0.138 s
% 0.14/0.45  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------