TSTP Solution File: AGT015+2 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : AGT015+2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 25 03:33:21 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.29s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 11 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 8 ( 8 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 2 sgn 4 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(159,axiom,
~ accept_city(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,towna),
file('/tmp/tmpfAqJeh/sel_AGT015+2.p_1',deduced_366) ).
fof(210,conjecture,
? [X5,X6] : ~ accept_city(X5,X6),
file('/tmp/tmpfAqJeh/sel_AGT015+2.p_1',query_15) ).
fof(211,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X5,X6] : ~ accept_city(X5,X6),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[210]) ).
fof(230,plain,
~ accept_city(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,towna),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[159,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(236,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X5,X6] : ~ accept_city(X5,X6),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[211,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(401,plain,
~ accept_city(muslimcountrybhumanitarianorganization,towna),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[230]) ).
fof(452,negated_conjecture,
! [X5,X6] : accept_city(X5,X6),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[236]) ).
fof(453,negated_conjecture,
! [X7,X8] : accept_city(X7,X8),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[452]) ).
cnf(454,negated_conjecture,
accept_city(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[453]) ).
cnf(465,plain,
$false,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[401,454,theory(equality)]),
[unfolding] ).
cnf(466,plain,
$false,
465,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/AGT/AGT015+2.p
% --creating new selector for [NUM005+0.ax, AGT001+0.ax, AGT001+1.ax, AGT001+2.ax, NUM005+1.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpfAqJeh/sel_AGT015+2.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem AGT015+2.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/AGT/AGT015+2.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/AGT/AGT015+2.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------