TSTP Solution File: AGT002+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : AGT002+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 11:57:46 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 1.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 8 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 6 ( 6 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query_2,conjecture,
~ accept_team(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,sufferterragovernment,towna,n6),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query_2) ).
fof(event_213,axiom,
~ accept_team(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,sufferterragovernment,towna,n6),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/AGT001+1.ax',event_213) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ accept_team(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,sufferterragovernment,towna,n6),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query_2]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
~ accept_team(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,sufferterragovernment,towna,n6),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[event_213]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
accept_team(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,sufferterragovernment,towna,n6),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
~ accept_team(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,sufferterragovernment,towna,n6),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
accept_team(christiansufferterrahumanitarianorganization,sufferterragovernment,towna,n6),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : AGT002+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Sat Jun 4 05:34:32 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/1.37 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.18/1.37 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.18/1.37 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 0.18/1.37
% 0.18/1.37 # Proof found!
% 0.18/1.37 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/1.37 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/1.37 # Proof object total steps : 8
% 0.18/1.37 # Proof object clause steps : 3
% 0.18/1.37 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.18/1.37 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 0.18/1.37 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 0.18/1.37 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.18/1.37 # Proof object initial clauses used : 2
% 0.18/1.37 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.18/1.37 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.18/1.37 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.18/1.37 # Parsed axioms : 556
% 0.18/1.37 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 455
% 0.18/1.37 # Initial clauses : 101
% 0.18/1.37 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Initial clauses in saturation : 101
% 0.18/1.37 # Processed clauses : 4
% 0.18/1.37 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # ...remaining for further processing : 3
% 0.18/1.37 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.18/1.37 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.18/1.37 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.18/1.37 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 97
% 0.18/1.37 # ...number of literals in the above : 97
% 0.18/1.37 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/1.37 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6301
% 0.18/1.37
% 0.18/1.37 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/1.37 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.18/1.37 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.18/1.37 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.18/1.37 # Maximum resident set size: 3808 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------