TPTP Problem File: SWV050+1.p

View Solutions - Solve Problem

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SWV050+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Domain   : Software Verification
% Problem  : Unsimplified proof obligation cl5_nebula_norm_0022
% Version  : [DFS04] axioms : Especial.
% English  : Proof obligation emerging from the norm-safety verification for
%            the cl5_nebula program. norm-safety ensures that the contents of
%            certain one-dimensional arrays add up to one.

% Refs     : [Fis04] Fischer (2004), Email to G. Sutcliffe
%          : [DFS04] Denney et al. (2004), Using Automated Theorem Provers
% Source   : [Fis04]
% Names    : cl5_nebula_norm_0022 [Fis04]

% Status   : Theorem
% Rating   : 0.30 v9.0.0, 0.36 v8.2.0, 0.33 v8.1.0, 0.31 v7.5.0, 0.34 v7.4.0, 0.17 v7.3.0, 0.31 v7.1.0, 0.22 v7.0.0, 0.30 v6.4.0, 0.35 v6.3.0, 0.29 v6.2.0, 0.40 v6.1.0, 0.47 v6.0.0, 0.39 v5.5.0, 0.44 v5.4.0, 0.50 v5.3.0, 0.63 v5.2.0, 0.45 v5.1.0, 0.57 v5.0.0, 0.58 v4.1.0, 0.61 v4.0.0, 0.62 v3.7.0, 0.70 v3.5.0, 0.79 v3.4.0, 1.00 v3.3.0
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   85 (  49 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  254 (  85 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  174 (   5   ~;  17   |;  95   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;  52  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    9 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   41 (  41 usr;  21 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  168 ( 168   !;   0   ?)
% SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ

% Comments :
% Bugfixes : v3.3.0 - Bugfix in SWV003+0
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----Include NASA software certification axioms
include('Axioms/SWV003+0.ax').
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----Proof obligation generated by the AutoBayes/AutoFilter system
fof(cl5_nebula_norm_0022,conjecture,
    ( ( pv86 = sum(n0,minus(n5,n1),divide(abs(minus(a_select2(mu,pv87),a_select2(muold,pv87))),plus(abs(a_select2(mu,pv87)),abs(a_select2(muold,pv87)))))
      & pv88 = sum(n0,minus(n5,n1),divide(abs(minus(a_select2(rho,pv89),a_select2(rhoold,pv89))),plus(abs(a_select2(rho,pv89)),abs(a_select2(rhoold,pv89))))) )
   => ( n0 = sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),divide(abs(minus(a_select2(sigma,pv91),a_select2(sigmaold,pv91))),plus(abs(a_select2(sigma,pv91)),abs(a_select2(sigmaold,pv91)))))
      & pv86 = sum(n0,minus(n5,n1),divide(abs(minus(a_select2(mu,pv87),a_select2(muold,pv87))),plus(abs(a_select2(mu,pv87)),abs(a_select2(muold,pv87)))))
      & pv88 = sum(n0,minus(n5,n1),divide(abs(minus(a_select2(rho,pv89),a_select2(rhoold,pv89))),plus(abs(a_select2(rho,pv89)),abs(a_select2(rhoold,pv89))))) ) ) ).

%----Automatically generated axioms

fof(gt_5_4,axiom,
    gt(n5,n4) ).

fof(gt_4_tptp_minus_1,axiom,
    gt(n4,tptp_minus_1) ).

fof(gt_5_tptp_minus_1,axiom,
    gt(n5,tptp_minus_1) ).

fof(gt_0_tptp_minus_1,axiom,
    gt(n0,tptp_minus_1) ).

fof(gt_1_tptp_minus_1,axiom,
    gt(n1,tptp_minus_1) ).

fof(gt_2_tptp_minus_1,axiom,
    gt(n2,tptp_minus_1) ).

fof(gt_3_tptp_minus_1,axiom,
    gt(n3,tptp_minus_1) ).

fof(gt_4_0,axiom,
    gt(n4,n0) ).

fof(gt_5_0,axiom,
    gt(n5,n0) ).

fof(gt_1_0,axiom,
    gt(n1,n0) ).

fof(gt_2_0,axiom,
    gt(n2,n0) ).

fof(gt_3_0,axiom,
    gt(n3,n0) ).

fof(gt_4_1,axiom,
    gt(n4,n1) ).

fof(gt_5_1,axiom,
    gt(n5,n1) ).

fof(gt_2_1,axiom,
    gt(n2,n1) ).

fof(gt_3_1,axiom,
    gt(n3,n1) ).

fof(gt_4_2,axiom,
    gt(n4,n2) ).

fof(gt_5_2,axiom,
    gt(n5,n2) ).

fof(gt_3_2,axiom,
    gt(n3,n2) ).

fof(gt_4_3,axiom,
    gt(n4,n3) ).

fof(gt_5_3,axiom,
    gt(n5,n3) ).

fof(finite_domain_4,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( leq(n0,X)
        & leq(X,n4) )
     => ( X = n0
        | X = n1
        | X = n2
        | X = n3
        | X = n4 ) ) ).

fof(finite_domain_5,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( leq(n0,X)
        & leq(X,n5) )
     => ( X = n0
        | X = n1
        | X = n2
        | X = n3
        | X = n4
        | X = n5 ) ) ).

fof(finite_domain_0,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( leq(n0,X)
        & leq(X,n0) )
     => X = n0 ) ).

fof(finite_domain_1,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( leq(n0,X)
        & leq(X,n1) )
     => ( X = n0
        | X = n1 ) ) ).

fof(finite_domain_2,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( leq(n0,X)
        & leq(X,n2) )
     => ( X = n0
        | X = n1
        | X = n2 ) ) ).

fof(finite_domain_3,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( leq(n0,X)
        & leq(X,n3) )
     => ( X = n0
        | X = n1
        | X = n2
        | X = n3 ) ) ).

fof(successor_4,axiom,
    succ(succ(succ(succ(n0)))) = n4 ).

fof(successor_5,axiom,
    succ(succ(succ(succ(succ(n0))))) = n5 ).

fof(successor_1,axiom,
    succ(n0) = n1 ).

fof(successor_2,axiom,
    succ(succ(n0)) = n2 ).

fof(successor_3,axiom,
    succ(succ(succ(n0))) = n3 ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------