TPTP Problem File: SET175+3.p

View Solutions - Solve Problem

%--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SET175+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Domain   : Set Theory
% Problem  : Absorbtion for union
% Version  : [Try90] axioms : Reduced > Incomplete.
% English  : The union of X and  the intersection of X and Y is X.

% Refs     : [ILF] The ILF Group (1998), The ILF System: A Tool for the Int
%          : [Try90] Trybulec (1990), Tarski Grothendieck Set Theory
%          : [TS89]  Trybulec & Swieczkowska (1989), Boolean Properties of
% Source   : [ILF]
% Names    : BOOLE (69) [TS89]

% Status   : Theorem
% Rating   : 0.19 v8.2.0, 0.22 v8.1.0, 0.17 v7.5.0, 0.19 v7.4.0, 0.13 v7.3.0, 0.17 v7.2.0, 0.14 v7.1.0, 0.17 v7.0.0, 0.20 v6.4.0, 0.19 v6.3.0, 0.25 v6.2.0, 0.24 v6.1.0, 0.33 v6.0.0, 0.35 v5.5.0, 0.41 v5.4.0, 0.46 v5.3.0, 0.52 v5.2.0, 0.35 v5.1.0, 0.33 v4.1.0, 0.22 v4.0.1, 0.26 v4.0.0, 0.25 v3.7.0, 0.20 v3.5.0, 0.21 v3.2.0, 0.18 v3.1.0, 0.22 v2.7.0, 0.00 v2.6.0, 0.14 v2.5.0, 0.12 v2.4.0, 0.00 v2.2.1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   19 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   10 (   0   ~;   1   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (  21   !;   0   ?)
% SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ

% Comments :
%--------------------------------------------------------------------------
%---- line(boole - df(2),1833042)
fof(union_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C,D] :
      ( member(D,union(B,C))
    <=> ( member(D,B)
        | member(D,C) ) ) ).

%---- line(boole - df(3),1833060)
fof(intersection_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C,D] :
      ( member(D,intersection(B,C))
    <=> ( member(D,B)
        & member(D,C) ) ) ).

%---- line(boole - df(8),1833103)
fof(equal_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( B = C
    <=> ( subset(B,C)
        & subset(C,B) ) ) ).

%---- property(commutativity,op(union,2,function))
fof(commutativity_of_union,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : union(B,C) = union(C,B) ).

%---- property(commutativity,op(intersection,2,function))
fof(commutativity_of_intersection,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : intersection(B,C) = intersection(C,B) ).

%---- line(tarski - df(3),1832749)
fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( subset(B,C)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( member(D,B)
         => member(D,C) ) ) ).

%---- property(reflexivity,op(subset,2,predicate))
fof(reflexivity_of_subset,axiom,
    ! [B] : subset(B,B) ).

%---- line(hidden - axiom112,1832615)
fof(equal_member_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( B = C
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( member(D,B)
        <=> member(D,C) ) ) ).

%---- line(boole - th(69),1833784)
fof(prove_absorbtion_for_union,conjecture,
    ! [B,C] : union(B,intersection(B,C)) = B ).

%--------------------------------------------------------------------------