TPTP Problem File: LCL039-1.p

View Solutions - Solve Problem

%--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LCL039-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Domain   : Logic Calculi (Implication/Negation 2 valued modal)
% Problem  : A theorem from Morgan
% Version  : [Pel86] axioms.
% English  : An axiomatisation of the Implication/Negation 2 valued
%            sentential calculus is {CN-18,CN-35,CN-49} by Church. This
%            can be extended to the  modal logic T by the addition
%            of three axioms for the modal operators. This problem proves
%            a simple result of T.

% Refs     : [Mor84] Morgan (1984), Logic Problems
%          : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% Source   : [Pel86]
% Names    : Pelletier 69 [Pel86]

% Status   : Unsatisfiable
% Rating   : 0.09 v8.2.0, 0.14 v8.1.0, 0.25 v7.4.0, 0.17 v7.3.0, 0.25 v6.2.0, 0.17 v6.1.0, 0.29 v6.0.0, 0.11 v5.5.0, 0.31 v5.4.0, 0.28 v5.3.0, 0.35 v5.2.0, 0.15 v5.1.0, 0.31 v5.0.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.33 v4.0.1, 0.00 v3.1.0, 0.17 v2.7.0, 0.38 v2.6.0, 0.29 v2.5.0, 0.00 v2.4.0, 0.00 v2.3.0, 0.14 v2.2.1, 0.56 v2.1.0, 0.63 v2.0.0
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   11 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    1 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 1-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   1 sgn)
% SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN

% Comments :
%--------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
    | is_a_theorem(Y) ) ).

cnf(cn_18,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X))) ).

cnf(cn_35,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(Y,Z)),implies(implies(X,Y),implies(X,Z)))) ).

cnf(cn_49,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X),not(Y)),implies(Y,X))) ).

cnf(necessitation1,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(necessary(implies(X,Y)),implies(necessary(X),necessary(Y)))) ).

cnf(necessitation2,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(necessary(X),X)) ).

cnf(axiom_of_necessitation,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X)
    | is_a_theorem(necessary(X)) ) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(necessary(a),not(necessary(not(a))))) ).

%--------------------------------------------------------------------------