TPTP Problem File: GRA032^2.p
View Solutions
- Solve Problem
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : GRA032^2 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.6.0.
% Domain : Graph Theory
% Problem : R(3,6) > 16
% Version : Especial.
% English :
% Refs : [Rad06] Radziszowski (2006), Small Ramsey Numbers
% : [Bro08] Brown (2008), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% Source : [Bro08]
% Names :
% Status : Theorem
% Rating : 0.88 v9.0.0, 1.00 v3.7.0
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 1 ( 0 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 0 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of connectives : 163 ( 32 ~; 16 |; 36 &; 76 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 47 ( 47 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 49 ( 49 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 0 ^; 18 !; 1 ?; 19 :)
% SPC : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% Comments : If a type alpha has exactly n elements, then we can prove
% R(k,l) > n by finding a graph (symmetric binary relation) on type
% alpha with no k-cliques and no l-independent sets. Likewise, we
% can prove R(k,l) <= n by proving every graph (symmetric binary
% relation) on alpha must have a k-clique or l-independent set.
% There is one type with 4 elements: o > o. There are two types
% with 16 elements: o > o > o and (o > o) > o. There are two types
% with 256 elements: o > o > o > o and o > (o > o) > o. This means
% we always have two formulations of R(k,l) >/<= 16 and two
% formulations of R(k,l) >/<= 256.
% :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(ramsey_l_3_6_16a,conjecture,
? [G: ( ( $o > $o ) > $o ) > ( ( $o > $o ) > $o ) > $o] :
( ! [Xx: ( $o > $o ) > $o,Xy: ( $o > $o ) > $o] :
( ( G @ Xx @ Xy )
=> ( G @ Xy @ Xx ) )
& ! [Xx0: ( $o > $o ) > $o,Xx1: ( $o > $o ) > $o,Xx2: ( $o > $o ) > $o,Xp0: ( ( $o > $o ) > $o ) > $o,Xp1: ( ( $o > $o ) > $o ) > $o] :
( ( ( Xp0 @ Xx0 )
& ~ ( Xp0 @ Xx1 )
& ~ ( Xp0 @ Xx2 )
& ~ ( Xp1 @ Xx0 )
& ( Xp1 @ Xx1 )
& ~ ( Xp1 @ Xx2 ) )
=> ( ~ ( G @ Xx1 @ Xx0 )
| ~ ( G @ Xx2 @ Xx0 )
| ~ ( G @ Xx2 @ Xx1 ) ) )
& ! [Xx0: ( $o > $o ) > $o,Xx1: ( $o > $o ) > $o,Xx2: ( $o > $o ) > $o,Xx3: ( $o > $o ) > $o,Xx4: ( $o > $o ) > $o,Xx5: ( $o > $o ) > $o,Xp0: ( ( $o > $o ) > $o ) > $o,Xp1: ( ( $o > $o ) > $o ) > $o,Xp2: ( ( $o > $o ) > $o ) > $o,Xp3: ( ( $o > $o ) > $o ) > $o,Xp4: ( ( $o > $o ) > $o ) > $o] :
( ( ( Xp0 @ Xx0 )
& ~ ( Xp0 @ Xx1 )
& ~ ( Xp0 @ Xx2 )
& ~ ( Xp0 @ Xx3 )
& ~ ( Xp0 @ Xx4 )
& ~ ( Xp0 @ Xx5 )
& ~ ( Xp1 @ Xx0 )
& ( Xp1 @ Xx1 )
& ~ ( Xp1 @ Xx2 )
& ~ ( Xp1 @ Xx3 )
& ~ ( Xp1 @ Xx4 )
& ~ ( Xp1 @ Xx5 )
& ~ ( Xp2 @ Xx0 )
& ~ ( Xp2 @ Xx1 )
& ( Xp2 @ Xx2 )
& ~ ( Xp2 @ Xx3 )
& ~ ( Xp2 @ Xx4 )
& ~ ( Xp2 @ Xx5 )
& ~ ( Xp3 @ Xx0 )
& ~ ( Xp3 @ Xx1 )
& ~ ( Xp3 @ Xx2 )
& ( Xp3 @ Xx3 )
& ~ ( Xp3 @ Xx4 )
& ~ ( Xp3 @ Xx5 )
& ~ ( Xp4 @ Xx0 )
& ~ ( Xp4 @ Xx1 )
& ~ ( Xp4 @ Xx2 )
& ~ ( Xp4 @ Xx3 )
& ( Xp4 @ Xx4 )
& ~ ( Xp4 @ Xx5 ) )
=> ( ( G @ Xx1 @ Xx0 )
| ( G @ Xx2 @ Xx0 )
| ( G @ Xx2 @ Xx1 )
| ( G @ Xx3 @ Xx0 )
| ( G @ Xx3 @ Xx1 )
| ( G @ Xx3 @ Xx2 )
| ( G @ Xx4 @ Xx0 )
| ( G @ Xx4 @ Xx1 )
| ( G @ Xx4 @ Xx2 )
| ( G @ Xx4 @ Xx3 )
| ( G @ Xx5 @ Xx0 )
| ( G @ Xx5 @ Xx1 )
| ( G @ Xx5 @ Xx2 )
| ( G @ Xx5 @ Xx3 )
| ( G @ Xx5 @ Xx4 ) ) ) ) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------