TMTP Model File: HWC004-1.008-Sat

View Problem - Process Model

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File       : Vampire---SAT-4.0
% Problem    : HWC004-1 : TPTP v6.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transform  : none
% Format     : tptp:raw
% Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -t %d %s

% Computer   : n134.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory     : 32286.75MB
% OS         : Linux 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64
% CPULimit   : 300s
% DateTime   : Wed Jul  8 11:10:42 EDT 2015

% Result     : Satisfiable 0.02s
% Output     : Saturation 0.02s
% Verified   : 
% Statistics : Number of clauses        :   10 (  10 expanded)
%              Number of leaves         :   10 (  10 expanded)
%              Depth                    :    0
%              Number of atoms          :   10 (  10 expanded)
%              Number of equality atoms :   10 (  10 expanded)
%              Maximal clause size      :    1 (   1 average)
%              Maximal term depth       :    2 (   2 average)

% Comments   : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Vampire---SAT-4.0 format not known, defaulting to TPTP
cnf(not_definition2,axiom,
    ( n0 = not(n1) )).

cnf(not_definition1,axiom,
    ( n1 = not(n0) )).

cnf(or_definition4,axiom,
    ( n1 = or(n1,n1) )).

cnf(or_definition3,axiom,
    ( n1 = or(n1,n0) )).

cnf(or_definition2,axiom,
    ( n1 = or(n0,n1) )).

cnf(or_definition1,axiom,
    ( n0 = or(n0,n0) )).

cnf(and_definition4,axiom,
    ( and(n1,n1) = n1 )).

cnf(and_definition3,axiom,
    ( n0 = and(n1,n0) )).

cnf(and_definition2,axiom,
    ( n0 = and(n0,n1) )).

cnf(and_definition1,axiom,
    ( n0 = and(n0,n0) )).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem    : HWC004-1 : TPTP v6.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -t %d %s
% 0.02/1.10  % Computer   : n134.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/1.10  % Model      : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/1.10  % CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/1.10  % Memory     : 32286.75MB
% 0.02/1.10  % OS         : Linux 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64
% 0.02/1.10  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.02/1.10  % DateTime   : Tue Jul  7 11:24:12 CDT 2015
% 0.02/1.10  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.02/1.10  Hi Geoff, go and have some cold beer while I am trying to solve this very hard problem!
% 0.02/1.10  % remaining time: 3000 next slice time: 3
% 0.02/1.10  dis+11_7_1 on theBenchmark
% 0.02/1.11  Satisfiable!
% 0.02/1.11  % SZS status Satisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.02/1.11  % # SZS output start Saturation.
% 0.02/1.11  cnf(not_definition2,axiom,
% 0.02/1.11      n0 = not(n1)).
% 0.02/1.11  
% 0.02/1.11  cnf(not_definition1,axiom,
% 0.02/1.11      n1 = not(n0)).
% 0.02/1.11  
% 0.02/1.11  cnf(or_definition4,axiom,
% 0.02/1.11      n1 = or(n1,n1)).
% 0.02/1.11  
% 0.02/1.11  cnf(or_definition3,axiom,
% 0.02/1.11      n1 = or(n1,n0)).
% 0.02/1.11  
% 0.02/1.11  cnf(or_definition2,axiom,
% 0.02/1.11      n1 = or(n0,n1)).
% 0.02/1.11  
% 0.02/1.11  cnf(or_definition1,axiom,
% 0.02/1.11      n0 = or(n0,n0)).
% 0.02/1.11  
% 0.02/1.11  cnf(and_definition4,axiom,
% 0.02/1.11      and(n1,n1) = n1).
% 0.02/1.11  
% 0.02/1.11  cnf(and_definition3,axiom,
% 0.02/1.11      n0 = and(n1,n0)).
% 0.02/1.11  
% 0.02/1.11  cnf(and_definition2,axiom,
% 0.02/1.11      n0 = and(n0,n1)).
% 0.02/1.11  
% 0.02/1.11  cnf(and_definition1,axiom,
% 0.02/1.11      n0 = and(n0,n0)).
% 0.02/1.11  
% 0.02/1.11  % # SZS output end Saturation.
% 0.02/1.11  % ------------------------------
% 0.02/1.11  % Version: Vampire 4.0 (commit 2df2fce on 2015-07-07 02:33:56 +0100)
% 0.02/1.11  % Termination reason: Satisfiable
% 0.02/1.11  
% 0.02/1.11  % Active clauses: 10
% 0.02/1.11  % Passive clauses: 10
% 0.02/1.11  % Generated clauses: 10
% 0.02/1.11  % Final active clauses: 10
% 0.02/1.11  % Input clauses: 10
% 0.02/1.11  % Initial clauses: 10
% 0.02/1.11  % 
% 0.02/1.11  % Memory used [KB]: 511
% 0.02/1.11  % Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 0.02/1.11  % ------------------------------
% 0.02/1.11  ----  Runtime statistics ----
% 0.02/1.11  clauses created: 10
% 0.02/1.11  -----------------------------
% 0.02/1.11  % ------------------------------
% 0.02/1.11  % Success in time 0.009 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------