TMTP Model File: GRP394-2.003-Sat

View Problem - Process Model

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File       : Vampire---4.0
% Problem    : GRP394-2 : TPTP v6.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transform  : none
% Format     : tptp:raw
% Command    : vampire --mode casc -t %d %s

% Computer   : n169.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory     : 32286.75MB
% OS         : Linux 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64
% CPULimit   : 300s
% DateTime   : Wed Jul  8 11:07:53 EDT 2015

% Result     : Satisfiable 12.48s
% Output     : Saturation 12.48s
% Verified   : 
% Statistics : Number of clauses        :    7 (   7 expanded)
%              Number of leaves         :    7 (   7 expanded)
%              Depth                    :    0
%              Number of atoms          :   17 (  17 expanded)
%              Number of equality atoms :    0 (   0 expanded)
%              Maximal clause size      :    4 (   2 average)
%              Maximal term depth       :    2 (   1 average)

% Comments   : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Vampire---4.0 format not known, defaulting to TPTP
cnf(total_function2,axiom,
    ( equalish(X2,X3)
    | ~ product(X0,X1,X3)
    | ~ product(X0,X1,X2) )).

cnf(product_substitution3,axiom,
    ( product(X3,X2,X1)
    | ~ product(X3,X2,X0)
    | ~ equalish(X0,X1) )).

cnf(associativity1,axiom,
    ( product(X0,X5,X3)
    | ~ product(X4,X2,X3)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X5)
    | ~ product(X0,X1,X4) )).

cnf(associativity2,axiom,
    ( product(X4,X2,X3)
    | ~ product(X0,X5,X3)
    | ~ product(X1,X2,X5)
    | ~ product(X0,X1,X4) )).

cnf(total_function1,axiom,
    ( product(X0,X1,multiply(X0,X1)) )).

cnf(left_inverse,axiom,
    ( product(inverse(X0),X0,identity) )).

cnf(left_identity,axiom,
    ( product(identity,X0,X0) )).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem    : GRP394-2 : TPTP v6.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command    : vampire --mode casc -t %d %s
% 0.01/1.07  % Computer   : n169.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.01/1.07  % Model      : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.01/1.07  % CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.01/1.07  % Memory     : 32286.75MB
% 0.01/1.07  % OS         : Linux 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64
% 0.01/1.07  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.01/1.07  % DateTime   : Tue Jul  7 10:54:13 CDT 2015
% 0.01/1.07  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.01/1.07  Hi Geoff, go and have some cold beer while I am trying to solve this very hard problem!
% 0.01/1.07  % remaining time: 3000 next slice time: 14
% 0.01/1.08  lrs+11_10_bs=unit_only:br=off:gs=on:gsssp=full:nwc=1:stl=30:sos=all:sac=on:sdd=large:ssfp=100000:ssfq=1.2:smm=off:ssnc=none:sp=occurrence:urr=on_13 on theBenchmark
% 0.01/1.08  % Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.01/1.08  % ------------------------------
% 0.01/1.08  % Version: Vampire 4.0 (commit 2df2fce on 2015-07-07 02:33:56 +0100)
% 0.01/1.08  % Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.01/1.08  
% 0.01/1.08  % Active clauses: 7
% 0.01/1.08  % Final active clauses: 7
% 0.01/1.08  % Input clauses: 7
% 0.01/1.08  % Initial clauses: 7
% 0.01/1.08  % 
% 0.01/1.08  % Memory used [KB]: 511
% 0.01/1.08  % Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.01/1.08  % ------------------------------
% 0.01/1.08  ----  Runtime statistics ----
% 0.01/1.08  clauses created: 7
% 0.01/1.08  -----------------------------
% 0.01/1.08  % ------------------------------
% 0.01/1.08  % remaining time: 2999 next slice time: 3
% 0.01/1.08  dis+1002_5_gs=on:gsem=off:gsssp=full:lwlo=on:nwc=1:sas=minisat:sos=on:sac=on:sdd=large:sfr=on:ssfp=100000:ssfq=1.0:ssnc=none:sp=reverse_arity_1 on theBenchmark
% 0.01/1.08  % Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.01/1.08  % ------------------------------
% 0.01/1.08  % Version: Vampire 4.0 (commit 2df2fce on 2015-07-07 02:33:56 +0100)
% 0.01/1.08  % Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.01/1.08  
% 0.01/1.08  % Active clauses: 7
% 0.01/1.08  % Final active clauses: 7
% 0.01/1.08  % Input clauses: 7
% 0.01/1.08  % Initial clauses: 7
% 0.01/1.08  % 
% 0.01/1.08  % SAT solver clauses: 2
% 0.01/1.08  % 
% 0.01/1.08  % Memory used [KB]: 511
% 0.01/1.08  % Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.01/1.08  % ------------------------------
% 0.01/1.08  ----  Runtime statistics ----
% 0.01/1.08  clauses created: 7
% 0.01/1.08  -----------------------------
% 0.01/1.08  % ------------------------------
% 0.01/1.08  % remaining time: 2999 next slice time: 123
% 0.01/1.09  dis+1_40_bs=unit_only:fsr=off:nwc=1:sas=minisat:sdd=large:ssfp=1000:ssfq=1.1:smm=sco:ssnc=none:sp=reverse_arity:updr=off_117 on theBenchmark
% 12.38/13.48  % (29417)Time limit reached!
% 12.38/13.48  % ------------------------------
% 12.38/13.48  % Version: Vampire 4.0 (commit 2df2fce on 2015-07-07 02:33:56 +0100)
% 12.38/13.48  % Termination reason: Time limit
% 12.38/13.48  % Termination phase: Saturation
% 12.38/13.48  
% 12.38/13.48  % Active clauses: 12871
% 12.38/13.48  % Passive clauses: 1169690
% 12.38/13.48  % Generated clauses: 1423237
% 12.38/13.48  % Final active clauses: 10379
% 12.38/13.48  % Final passive clauses: 1136283
% 12.38/13.48  % Input clauses: 7
% 12.38/13.48  % Initial clauses: 7
% 12.38/13.48  % 
% 12.38/13.48  % Simple tautologies: 63
% 12.38/13.48  % Forward subsumptions: 274019
% 12.38/13.48  % Backward subsumptions: 2492
% 12.38/13.48  % 
% 12.38/13.48  % Binary resolution: 1423230
% 12.38/13.48  % 
% 12.38/13.48  % SAT solver clauses: 1
% 12.38/13.48  % 
% 12.38/13.48  % Memory used [KB]: 462337
% 12.38/13.48  % Time elapsed: 12.400 s
% 12.38/13.48  % ------------------------------
% 12.38/13.48  ----  Runtime statistics ----
% 12.38/13.48  clauses created: 1423237
% 12.38/13.48  clauses deleted: 253547
% 12.38/13.48  -----------------------------
% 12.38/13.48  % ------------------------------
% 12.48/13.51  % remaining time: 2875 next slice time: 4
% 12.48/13.51  dis-11_5_cond=fast:fsr=off:gs=on:gsem=off:nwc=1:spl=off:sp=occurrence:updr=off_2 on theBenchmark
% 12.48/13.51  Satisfiable!
% 12.48/13.51  % SZS status Satisfiable for theBenchmark
% 12.48/13.51  % # SZS output start Saturation.
% 12.48/13.51  cnf(total_function2,axiom,
% 12.48/13.51      equalish(X2,X3) | ~product(X0,X1,X3) | ~product(X0,X1,X2)).
% 12.48/13.51  
% 12.48/13.51  cnf(product_substitution3,axiom,
% 12.48/13.51      product(X3,X2,X1) | ~product(X3,X2,X0) | ~equalish(X0,X1)).
% 12.48/13.51  
% 12.48/13.51  cnf(associativity1,axiom,
% 12.48/13.51      product(X0,X5,X3) | ~product(X4,X2,X3) | ~product(X1,X2,X5) | ~product(X0,X1,X4)).
% 12.48/13.51  
% 12.48/13.51  cnf(associativity2,axiom,
% 12.48/13.51      product(X4,X2,X3) | ~product(X0,X5,X3) | ~product(X1,X2,X5) | ~product(X0,X1,X4)).
% 12.48/13.51  
% 12.48/13.51  cnf(total_function1,axiom,
% 12.48/13.51      product(X0,X1,multiply(X0,X1))).
% 12.48/13.51  
% 12.48/13.51  cnf(left_inverse,axiom,
% 12.48/13.51      product(inverse(X0),X0,identity)).
% 12.48/13.51  
% 12.48/13.51  cnf(left_identity,axiom,
% 12.48/13.51      product(identity,X0,X0)).
% 12.48/13.51  
% 12.48/13.51  % # SZS output end Saturation.
% 12.48/13.51  % ------------------------------
% 12.48/13.51  % Version: Vampire 4.0 (commit 2df2fce on 2015-07-07 02:33:56 +0100)
% 12.48/13.51  % Termination reason: Satisfiable
% 12.48/13.51  
% 12.48/13.51  % Active clauses: 7
% 12.48/13.51  % Passive clauses: 7
% 12.48/13.51  % Generated clauses: 7
% 12.48/13.51  % Final active clauses: 7
% 12.48/13.51  % Input clauses: 7
% 12.48/13.51  % Initial clauses: 7
% 12.48/13.51  % 
% 12.48/13.51  % SAT solver clauses: 14
% 12.48/13.51  % SAT solver unit clauses: 6
% 12.48/13.51  % 
% 12.48/13.51  % TWLsolver clauses: 14
% 12.48/13.51  % TWLsolver calls for satisfiability: 158
% 12.48/13.51  % 
% 12.48/13.51  % Memory used [KB]: 639
% 12.48/13.51  % Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 12.48/13.51  % ------------------------------
% 12.48/13.51  ----  Runtime statistics ----
% 12.48/13.51  clauses created: 7
% 12.48/13.51  -----------------------------
% 12.48/13.51  % ------------------------------
% 12.48/13.51  % Success in time 12.437 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------