0.12/0.14	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.12/0.15	% Command    : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
0.15/0.37	% Computer   : n027.cluster.edu
0.15/0.37	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.15/0.37	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.15/0.37	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.15/0.37	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.15/0.37	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.15/0.37	% WCLimit    : 120
0.15/0.37	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 11:17:55 EDT 2021
0.15/0.37	% CPUTime    : 
0.15/0.40	# No SInE strategy applied
0.15/0.40	# Auto-Mode selected heuristic H_____047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S
0.15/0.40	# and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
0.15/0.40	#
0.15/0.40	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.15/0.40	# Number of axioms: 5 Number of unprocessed: 5
0.15/0.40	# Tableaux proof search.
0.15/0.40	# APR header successfully linked.
0.15/0.40	# Hello from C++
0.15/0.40	# The folding up rule is enabled...
0.15/0.40	# Local unification is enabled...
0.15/0.40	# Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
0.15/0.40	# 5 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
0.15/0.40	# Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
0.15/0.40	# There are 1 start rule candidates:
0.15/0.40	# Found 5 unit axioms.
0.15/0.40	# 1 start rule tableaux created.
0.15/0.40	# 0 extension rule candidate clauses
0.15/0.40	# 5 unit axiom clauses
0.15/0.40	
0.15/0.40	# Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
0.15/0.40	# There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
0.15/0.40	# Creating equality axioms
0.15/0.40	# Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
0.15/0.40	# Returning from population with 10 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
0.15/0.40	# We now have 10 tableaux to operate on
0.15/0.42	# There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
0.15/0.42	# There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
0.15/0.42	# There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
0.15/0.42	# There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
0.15/0.42	# There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
0.15/0.42	# There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
0.15/0.42	# There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
0.15/0.42	# There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
0.15/0.42	# SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.15/0.42	# SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.15/0.42	# Begin clausification derivation
0.15/0.42	
0.15/0.42	# End clausification derivation
0.15/0.42	# Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
0.15/0.42	cnf(i_0_10, hypothesis, (add(X1,c)=c)).
0.15/0.42	cnf(i_0_7, plain, (add(add(X1,X2),X3)=add(X1,add(X2,X3)))).
0.15/0.42	cnf(i_0_8, plain, (negate(add(negate(add(X1,X2)),negate(add(X1,negate(X2)))))=X1)).
0.15/0.42	cnf(i_0_6, plain, (add(X1,X2)=add(X2,X1))).
0.15/0.42	cnf(i_0_9, negated_conjecture, (add(negate(add(a,negate(b))),negate(add(negate(b),negate(a))))!=b)).
0.15/0.42	cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X4=X4)).
0.15/0.42	# End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
0.15/0.42	# Begin printing tableau
0.15/0.42	# Found 6 steps
0.15/0.42	cnf(i_0_8, plain, (negate(add(negate(add(b,X2)),negate(add(b,negate(X2)))))=b), inference(start_rule)).
0.15/0.42	cnf(i_0_20, plain, (negate(add(negate(add(b,X2)),negate(add(b,negate(X2)))))=b), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])).
0.15/0.42	cnf(i_0_40, plain, (add(negate(add(a,negate(b))),negate(add(negate(b),negate(a))))=b), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])).
0.15/0.42	cnf(i_0_41, plain, (add(negate(add(a,negate(b))),negate(add(negate(b),negate(a))))!=negate(add(negate(add(b,X2)),negate(add(b,negate(X2)))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])).
0.15/0.42	cnf(i_0_53, plain, (add(negate(add(a,negate(b))),negate(add(negate(b),negate(a))))!=negate(add(negate(add(add(negate(add(a,negate(b))),negate(add(negate(b),negate(a)))),X2)),negate(add(add(negate(add(a,negate(b))),negate(add(negate(b),negate(a)))),negate(X2)))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])).
0.15/0.42	cnf(i_0_54, plain, (negate(add(negate(add(add(negate(add(a,negate(b))),negate(add(negate(b),negate(a)))),X2)),negate(add(add(negate(add(a,negate(b))),negate(add(negate(b),negate(a)))),negate(X2)))))!=negate(add(negate(add(b,X2)),negate(add(b,negate(X2)))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_54, ...])).
0.15/0.42	# End printing tableau
0.15/0.42	# SZS output end
0.15/0.42	# Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
0.15/0.42	# Child (31749) has found a proof.
0.15/0.42	
0.15/0.42	# Proof search is over...
0.15/0.42	# Freeing feature tree
0.15/0.42	EOF