0.05/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.05/0.11	% Command    : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
0.11/0.31	% Computer   : n013.cluster.edu
0.11/0.31	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.31	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.31	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.11/0.31	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.11/0.31	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.11/0.31	% WCLimit    : 120
0.11/0.31	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 13:21:33 EDT 2021
0.11/0.32	% CPUTime    : 
0.16/0.34	# No SInE strategy applied
0.16/0.34	# Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
0.16/0.34	# and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
0.16/0.34	#
0.16/0.34	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.16/0.34	# Number of axioms: 2 Number of unprocessed: 2
0.16/0.34	# Tableaux proof search.
0.16/0.34	# APR header successfully linked.
0.16/0.34	# Hello from C++
0.97/1.16	# The folding up rule is enabled...
0.97/1.16	# Local unification is enabled...
0.97/1.16	# Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
0.97/1.16	# 2 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
0.97/1.16	# Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
0.97/1.16	# There are 1 start rule candidates:
0.97/1.16	# Found 2 unit axioms.
0.97/1.16	# 1 start rule tableaux created.
0.97/1.16	# 0 extension rule candidate clauses
0.97/1.16	# 2 unit axiom clauses
0.97/1.16	
0.97/1.16	# Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
0.97/1.16	# There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
0.97/1.16	# Creating equality axioms
0.97/1.16	# Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
1.66/1.89	# There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
1.66/1.89	# There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
1.66/1.89	# There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
1.66/1.89	# There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
1.66/1.89	# There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
1.66/1.89	# There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
1.66/1.89	# There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
1.66/1.89	# There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
1.66/1.89	# SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
1.66/1.89	# SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
1.66/1.89	# Begin clausification derivation
1.66/1.89	
1.66/1.89	# End clausification derivation
1.66/1.89	# Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
1.66/1.89	cnf(i_0_3, plain, (multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,multiply(X3,multiply(multiply(inverse(X3),inverse(multiply(X4,X2))),X1)))))=X4)).
1.66/1.89	cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3)!=multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)))).
1.66/1.89	cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X5=X5)).
1.66/1.89	# End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
1.66/1.89	# Begin printing tableau
1.66/1.89	# Found 6 steps
1.66/1.89	cnf(i_0_3, plain, (multiply(X24,inverse(multiply(X23,multiply(X22,multiply(multiply(inverse(X22),inverse(multiply(multiply(b3,c3),X23))),X24)))))=multiply(b3,c3)), inference(start_rule)).
1.66/1.89	cnf(i_0_12, plain, (multiply(X24,inverse(multiply(X23,multiply(X22,multiply(multiply(inverse(X22),inverse(multiply(multiply(b3,c3),X23))),X24)))))=multiply(b3,c3)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])).
1.66/1.89	cnf(i_0_25, plain, (multiply(X29,inverse(multiply(X28,multiply(X27,multiply(multiply(inverse(X27),inverse(multiply(a3,X28))),X29)))))!=a3), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_3])).
1.66/1.89	cnf(i_0_24, plain, (multiply(multiply(X29,inverse(multiply(X28,multiply(X27,multiply(multiply(inverse(X27),inverse(multiply(a3,X28))),X29))))),multiply(X24,inverse(multiply(X23,multiply(X22,multiply(multiply(inverse(X22),inverse(multiply(multiply(b3,c3),X23))),X24))))))=multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
1.66/1.89	cnf(i_0_31, plain, (multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3)=multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
1.66/1.89	cnf(i_0_32, plain, (multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3)!=multiply(multiply(X29,inverse(multiply(X28,multiply(X27,multiply(multiply(inverse(X27),inverse(multiply(a3,X28))),X29))))),multiply(X24,inverse(multiply(X23,multiply(X22,multiply(multiply(inverse(X22),inverse(multiply(multiply(b3,c3),X23))),X24))))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_32, ...])).
1.66/1.89	# End printing tableau
1.66/1.89	# SZS output end
1.66/1.89	# Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
1.66/1.89	# Returning from population with 7 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
1.66/1.89	# We now have 7 tableaux to operate on
1.66/1.89	# Found closed tableau during pool population.
1.66/1.89	# Proof search is over...
1.66/1.89	# Freeing feature tree
1.66/1.90	EOF